Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

how to interlink the pages

         

OptWizard

9:56 pm on Feb 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



split from: [webmasterworld.com...]

Question: I have a page with lots of pages so far about 50 looking to addmore to get to that 100. The question I have is how to interlink the pages would a site map from the front page be OK? Or having a link on the front page for each page so the front page would have 100 links on it?

Can someone clear this up?

deft_spyder

7:32 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"Question: I have is how to interlink the pages would a site map from the front page be OK? Or having a link on the front page for each page so the front page would have 100 links on it? "

Ive found a great way to have a small amount of area contain as many links as you'd like is to take advantage od a drop down menu. From what I have read here, google can follow them, and its great for pages without alot of real estate to give.

And on the topic, I have created a site that is now 112 pages, and has been using bretts techniques, along with others gleaned here. It just just got its first deep crawl last month. I have made several changes inbetween that time and now. This month we will see what these techniques can garner you almost immediately.

Considering the changes that have occured since this article was published, and the time frame of starting now instead of a year ago, perhaps this will shed some light on its continuing effectiveness.

OptWizard

7:41 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So a drop down would be better than a site map or both the same?

deft_spyder

7:49 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Id say the major difference is that a site map is a page linked from the main page, and a drop down would give those pages a link from the main page.

depending on how you want to divide internal PR, and the importance you want to give the pages linked should determine which way you'd like to go.

Brett_Tabke

9:06 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Site map is ok - drop down is out. Use cross linking. Link a to b, b to c, c to d, d back to a.

Interlink them when appropriate and on topic. (that's in addition to a standard navigation system that links to your main topic pages).

deft_spyder

9:21 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



brett, can you expand on why the dropdown is out? i decided on that as a solution for not turning my index into a news portal, but if you say its out... why?

i do have a sitemap as well.

bobmark

9:29 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree with Brett for a couple of reasons. One is the sometimes problems with javascript or whatever else you use for a dropdown being followed by some bots, the second a design issue. Have you ever noticed a complex dropdown is the last thing to load on a page, meaning visitors who might know what they want instantly have to wait for your menu to appear to go anywhere?
Even with only fifty pages I would think they would still be organized into subcategories - blue widgets, green widgets, red widgets - so a simple quick jump menu on your entry page will get you all the crawling you want.

steve128

10:26 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)



Not sure if I'm qualified to answer, but for me:

I have 150 pages all closely related links are shown on about 60 pages pages including a home page link, with these 60 links on each page, plus a site map link. A home page link and a site map link are given on every page within the site.

So in effect, I have 60 interlinked pages, and all 150 links provided on the site map page.

I do also use a doorway page but content rich, not a redirect and no links to it from the site.

Until a week ago or so the doorway page also had 60 links, I have now removed all links from this page except to the home page. (dunno if I have done the right thing yet)

Both my home page, and my doorway page are PR5, with all others PR4. (a few selling pages are PR3)

I was guessing by removing 59 links from the doorway page may increase my home page PR, just a guess I will not know for a while.

So back to your Q, re drop downs:

I have another site, which I must admit is going to expire!
But I use drop downs there, the home page is PR4, the rest of the pages are PR1?
I can't honestly say the drop downs are the cause though.

deft_spyder

10:56 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ok, i screwed up. I am referring to a list menu. My terminology wasn't on. What I'm referring to is:

<select name="select">
<option value="link.htm">link title</option>
</select>

NOT a javascript drop down. Knowing this, is there still a problem?

Steve:
By removing most of the outgoing links from your doorway, the homepage you do still link to is now getting a higher internal PR "vote" from that page. I do think that, while it may not push you up a whole PR notch, it certainly will help. Before the vote it had was divided up 60 times.

steve128

11:22 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)



deft_spyder
Thanks for the info, I did think the same

I also used an html drop down in my example, not java,
It took bloody ages to configure!
Though some here could have done it 10 mins, oh well I like to learn, all it costs is time

Brett_Tabke

11:54 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Don't expect all bots to follow that drop down and Google has at times dropped support for that. Users don't care for them either. Forms for navigation are confusing and contradictory. One site, you select a drop down and it flys off on a javascript excursion. The next you have to hit a submit button. So why use it?

steve128

1:02 am on Feb 8, 2003 (gmt 0)



Yes very confusing, I hate them drop downs that auto to another page, especially when you get there and then hit the back button, scroll down the original page with the mouse wheel and all thats happening is changing the drop down target page. Disco screen!

steve128

1:07 am on Feb 8, 2003 (gmt 0)



I know a simple click on a blank bit of the page would cure it, but i often forget

deft_spyder

1:17 am on Feb 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I use the dropdown because it is a way to have every link on the site avaliable in very little real estate on the front page... it is not necessarily for the user. If google drops support, then the sitemap is always there to pick up the slack. I can't see it hurting if it is done in a sensible design.

In some user testing I've done dropdown menus have been little used at the beginning, but after a while, groups tend to begin using them for quickness sake. These were in user groups of 30 people, in a singular dept testing an intranets admin tool set. This was for a site that needed quick access to multiple reporting tools, and was obviously used alot. You can adjust those findings for your own site and UI. Zerox park place spent alot of money to discover that drop down menus were a good way for users to be able to access info.

I personally believe you should design your site to work the best for your users. You can't always play to other sites conventions simply for the sake of being standardized; it may just not work for your site. Pick the UI thats fits your information architecture, but acknowledge that most users may be familiar with the 'amazon' way of purchasing, and that can be used to your advantage.

So, it seems that you can use a list menu, but support for that is non-existant on some crawlers, and is currently supported, though intermitantly, on google. I will never abandon the 'site map' link on my site, but I do find the dropdown a real estate friendly was to get all of your links on the front page. You should keep in mind that you are splitting up your index vote amongst every page, if that matters to you.

OptWizard

8:02 pm on Feb 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So a site map would be better cause you would not be giving away so much PR from front page correct?

deft_spyder

3:32 am on Feb 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



no, it depends on where you want that pr to go. no,w i do believe that a page is thought of better by goggle if it has a link from index.

would some guru please straighten this out. i know alot, but i certainly dont want to steer anyone astray. if ive got this wrong, please chime in.

ciml

12:58 pm on Feb 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I agree with you deft_spyder, but it depends on what you want to achieve.

From a promotion point of view, I'd consider putting the 'main' links near the top of the site structure (usually home page) and the secondary links below. Ideally, the main links can be categories that link down to the secondary topics (see Brett's Theme Pyramids [searchengineworld.com]). Otherwise, the secondaries could go on the site map, pulling some PageRank but leaving more for the high priorities.

From a Google ROI perspective, the 'main' links might be those with more or less competition than the others (depending on whether you're able to get high positions for your niche or more popular phrases). Alternatively they might be the phrases most often searched (if you're confident of being able to get the top spots) or the phrases with the best potential return (eg. high margin products).

Ultimately, if you stick to the fundamentals (good link text, matching page titles and body text) then if you just structure your links from a user perspective it should turn out to be pretty good for Google too.

If you end up with a lot of links (maybe more than a hundred), then you're better off splitting them onto more pages.