Forum Moderators: open
In truth I would like to see google not be so big... right now my company is enjoying a boom and we hold #1 for our relevant KWs in google... if we should fall out of favour with google or get beat out of the top 10 I think we would suffer a lot.
jp
not wearing blinders.... but reading about Teoma (must of been a press release) felt like reading why 4 razor blades is better than 3... just a lot of hype
I also think we should have an eye on them since they seem quite promising to me as well.
If I target a keyword on Google with my site I will have 12 chances a year to get to the top and I always get there eventually.
Google give you a PR toolbar to see how you are doing with you sites and from this you can tell if you are linking to a bad neighbourhood and much more.
Google should have the power of the webdesigners behind them with these facts in mind.
Google is the savior of the Webdesigner.
THANK YOU GOOGLE!
i don't like teoma's commercial aspect at all. their subject indexing gimmick sounds confusing on paper and works even less brilliantly in real searches. i think the best bet is a modified version of google's way, using links. i think they should have a link priority system. or value. certain links have less priority/value (guestbooks, lesser content sites, etc.), and they should keep track of users clickthroughs on results...purely for indexing purposes. like if someone clicks through for one result, then that's another value that goes up for that site's listing, and combine this with the link priority/value system. if the user does not come back for another search on the same topic (track this using cookies), then it goes up higher. and then of course, a more practical verison of the subject thing that teoma uses. this is all pretty hard and complex to do for a search engine i guess, but in this day and age, there's nothing else. i don't like companies banging through search engines with PR gimmicks instead of actual search engine advancements.
just my $0.50
That refine search suggestion feature relieves you of that hunt & peck search process where the engine double dares you to guess what I know.
I would like to see Google take the tech behind "labs" and roll it into a "search suggestion" feature at the bottom of every search as a "related searches", or "suggested searches". Even just the top 3 related queries would make a big difference. (better yet - sneak them into a box below adwords to train surfers to look over there ;-)
My site is called "bigredwidgets.com" and a search for "big red widgets" (in quotes) should bring up NO sites other than mine, as i have yet to find any site on the web with those words in that order. i've got tons of incoming links, moz, yahoo, the works.
Teoma? Nada. My site does not exist. There are no results for "big red widgets," even though my site is the only place on the internet where you can find those words.
Not only would i not recommend Teoma, i would recommend strongly against it. i ran some test searches, and the "results" (using the term loosely) are padded full of commercial interests. A searcher does not get a comprehensive list of what's available.
Why would i recommend Teoma to anyone? Why would i send them $60?
GoogleGuy, feelin' mellow tonight :)