Forum Moderators: open
Just to know whether I'm using my efforts wisely...
Thanks.
cats_and_dog_for_sale_in_the_uk.htm
or
catsdogssale.htm
Keep em short and sweet if possible and logical, keep a theme in the way you name your pages IMHO. I think there is going to be an upper limit to how much impact they have depending on size and a small amount in ranking. Take this sites urls, all numbers. You still get WebmasterWorld pages ranking high based on the design and content, not mainly on the page title.
ROI is Return on Investment.
Googleguy has suggested that hyphens are better at delimiting words in a URL than underscores:
[webmasterworld.com...]
Also check the post by WebGuerilla, msg #12 in the same thread.
There have been several recent discussions of that issue here, use site search to find out more.
Oohps, yes i'm not native english ... ;)
Sorry, i guess ROI is the wrong phrase since i don't mean a better return of investment. What i mean is that the click trough rate (CTR) could be higher if you use descriptive file names / urls .
(... and lower if you-use-too-descriptive-hyphenated-file-names. I agree with ukgimp's suggestion.)
So how many hyphens are reasonable? All my plain content pages (currently around 90) are of the form /catsanddogs.htm but I've got just a couple of pages with a possible revenue potential of the form /floppy-hat-for-sale.htm i.e. four words separated by hyphens. It would be no trouble to modify these filenames if it was worthless or counter-productive to bother with the hyphens. Obviously I've optimised the pages themselves and inbound links for 'floppy hat for sale' anyway.