Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Nets Seven-Figure Ad Deal

big advertising deal in Europe

         

vitaplease

3:37 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Nice deal! [reuters.com]

Lloyds TSB signs up.
Up go Adword-select prices which are insurance related..

heini

3:51 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Lloyds is paying for more than 1,000 insurance-related keywords as it targets Google's 7.5 million British users over a one-year period.

Mmmm - Do they (www.insurance.co.uk) also advertize on Overture, or Espotting?

Marcia

4:08 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



That's a nice bit of change there:

Lloyds is paying Google roughly $1.55 million to boost sales of insurance products on its Web site, www.insurance.co.uk, in one of the single biggest online advertising deals struck in Europe recently.

I can just imagine the amount of research done before Lloyds struck a deal with Google for that amount of money. Who's next, which industry will follow suit?

vitaplease

4:25 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Say an average of $ 0.10 per click for the different 1000 keywords (assuming a better price than we get).
at $1.55 mill for one year, that would be approx. 15 million clicks the year

I think the Lloyds back-office will need some back-up ;)
at 220 working days a year and a 2% feed-back/info-request to click ratio, that would be approx 1400 extra emails to respond to a working-day !

Who's next, which industry will follow suit?

I would say the other insurance companies would be next first? (I would panic)

ciml

4:34 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



37 times the $10,000 per three months minumum for premium sponsorship is pretty good, but the article doesn't state that it's for one year. I wonder how much they spend on TV ad's, with little or no real targeting.

This is probably a very good time for large businesses with online capability to neotiate with Google; the longer the term the better IMO.

> 1400 extra emails

Including "your site doesn't work in my browser", perhaps?

vitaplease

4:56 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



..as it targets Google's 7.5 million British users over a one-year period.

yep Ciml, misinterpreted that, should be a longer period..
(every targeted user would have to click twice, on average, with the 15 mill. clicks I mentioned earlier ;))

lazerzubb

4:57 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Will be very intressting to see what solution they will present.

ciml

5:42 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I missed that part vitaplease. You were right, apparently I'm worth thirteen pence per year each (about 8 US cents).

If we assume an average of less than £1 per click (looking at UK overture) then about one in seven UK Google users needs to click it. 13%CTR sounds optimistic to me, but not much. It's for a top of page listing, which would cost more in some other other places.

nutsandbolts

6:31 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



*open mouth*

Blimey, my Web marketing company could of done that deal for half the cost! ;)

brotherhood of LAN

7:22 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



bit OT, but its good to see that advertizing...particularly non-banner based (!) has confidence placed within them....best way to get the message across!

Good to see Google is attracting the sort of company that can throw seven figure sums around for ads.

Marcia

7:56 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Good to see Google is attracting the sort of company that can throw seven figure sums around for ads.

I don't know quite how to say this so that it comes out right. Google has not only strived for excellence in their search results, but there's something about the way Google has managed to maintain their aura of academic integrity and has steadfastly stayed with their elegant simplicity of presence that just absolutely spells "class."

People don't go for snake-oil peddlar type presentations these days, especially the web-savvy, sophisticated segment of the net population. And I'm sorry, I certainly don't mean to cast any negative aspersions on any others, but several sections of different PPC ads in a row, glaringly commercialized blinking banners and pop-ups, pop-unders and confusingly cluttered, commercialized web pages are not at all what I'd expect Lloyd's to associate themselves with.

Google is what's perfectly fitting for Lloyds, when you think about the congruence of the image. Stability, reliability, excellence, class and integrity.

Have I mentioned lately that I love Google? I love the way they've set themselves in a straight line and never deviate. And yet, they manage to stay "human" and likeable at the same time. I'm so glad they got Lloyd's; they deserve it, and every bit of success they've achieved and will continue to achieve.

[edited by: Marcia at 8:02 pm (utc) on Aug. 1, 2002]

NFFC

8:00 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Lloyd's

It's not THE Lloyd's, just a little bank.

Great deal for Google though, great for online advertising in general.

GoogleGuy

4:16 am on Aug 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey Marcia, I know what you mean about the snake-oil thing. I just a letter today that was a survey, but the group wanted a donation included with the completed survey. This was a respectable organization, too. Maybe I'm a little cynical, but I think users can smell those conflicts of interest from a mile away.