Forum Moderators: open
My website is designed with alot small <img>'s (for instance <img src="/pics/blank.gif" width="1" height="3">). Are these small images having a negative effect in serps?
Are these small images having a negative effect in serps?
Using invisible image spacers is not a good way to lay out a page, if that's what those images are for. A "highly-optimized" page would separate content from style/layout to minimize code-bloat and place important content where it sits better: towards the top of the source code. Even a small negative effect is worth correcting, whilst making the page more accessible, faster loading, and standards-compliant into the bargain.
I have now reduced the number of small images almost 60%. Afterwords I jumped from #10 to #9 in SERPS.
Is this improvement achieved because of the reduced number of images or because of the other things I have done to optimize my website?
My website (at least my frontpage) is spidered every day or every seccond day. I can see that in Googles cache. But my rankings don't seem to improve much (only from #10 to #9).
Do the changes take effect immideately or how long does it take?
See this post about when you can expect your changes to have been figured into your SERPS.
[webmasterworld.com...]
Google Guy gave a semi definitive answer!
Suggy
I would like to believe that structurally efficient pages enjoy somewhat better rankings, but I can't demonstrate this to be a fact. In any case, cause and effect can be hard to connect when movements are only minor, even when pages are frequently crawled, especially if you've implemented a number of different measures at the same time.
Having said that, reducing your spacer images is worth doing for several reasons, not all connected to SERPS.