Forum Moderators: open
The funny thing is that BigSite network is hardly on the ropes or unaware of how this PR thing works. They must be viewing it as an absolutely normal additional revenue stream. The trend is apparently catching on.
[edited by: heini at 10:18 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2003]
[edit reason] Removed specifics [/edit]
Also, there was talk at the August SES that off-topic links are deprecated so it wouldn't surprise me that the link didn't pass PR.
The value here is that although not topically relevant, the links are relevant in that the audience may tend to go to trade shows.
I'd say it's good marketing, PR is inconsequential.
[edited by: heini at 10:18 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2003]
martinibuster, it's pretty obvious that links and anchor texts were designed to be read by Google, not by the human visitor. And they do pass PR. If you want text ads that make people click, you do something like AdSense, not weirdly sounding two-word combinations with no info at all.
it's pretty obvious that links and anchor texts were designed to be read by Google, not by the human visitor.
There is nothing extraordinary about the links. They don't even have a title, i.e. title="keyword phrase". They make perfect sense to the visitor because they link to relevant content.
And they do pass PR.
So what?
The important thing to note is that your title for this thread is misleading. They are not selling PR. They are selling advertising. Nowhere on their website do they offer to sell PR.
Many banners and links pass PR- but this has ALWAYS been the case and is not limited to O'Reilly.
[edited by: heini at 10:19 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2003]
[edited by: martinibuster at 10:54 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2003]
The lack of TITLE attribute is an interesting observation, but it doesn't change my impression a great deal. I know of several sites that sell PR right and left, and their links don't contain it too.
My goal when starting this thread was to hear what people think and possible see more examples of working PR-based advertising.