Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

The Google Directory just updated!

I can't believe my eyes...

         

steveb

6:44 am on Nov 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



And up to date as of the last dump too it appears.

The Contractor

1:00 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



And if you look at profiles with personal homepages (rather than full-blown website/domains) linked from them, it is easy to see that the profile PR is the root of whatever PR the personal page has.

Hmm... maybe that's the catch. I am talking about editor "websites" that are in their profiles.

kittyheads

2:31 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Now seeing the update on directory.google.com. Anyone else?

Stark

3:03 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm not seeing my category updated on directory.google.com but is updated on directory-ex

kittyheads

3:39 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Whoops ... looks like I jumped the gun ... and didn't read very carefully either. I agree with GreatVista (msg 58) that we are fluctuating on the main directory between the old data and the new.

rfgdxm1

4:21 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Started last month as far as I can tell. They always showed before

But, did they count links for algo ranking before? Currently, guestbook pages themselves show in the SERPs. However, links on guestbook pages are ignored for the algo. For a while, according to Googleguy, Google ignored guestbook links for ranking, but showed them with the link: command. Then, Google quit showing them with the link: command also. Possibly because people with guestbooks were complaining Google was encouraging spamming them.

rfgdxm1

4:31 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>While it might be popular in many quarters of WW, the "downgrading" of certain sections of the ODP (including backlinks from some editor profiles) probably has had more to do with the technical problems than with any nefarious Google scheme to do away with the value from either DMOZ or the Google Directory.

This would tend to explain a lot. I had assumed that Google was able to do a successful crawl of the ODP. If Google only partially crawled the ODP, then backlinks you'd expect to be showing may not show.

kaled

4:34 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Whoops ... looks like I jumped the gun.

Is that premature interpretation?

John_Caius

5:22 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Putting a date on it - an editor who was awarded a new cat on Oct 26th is showing in directory-ex - so the update must have taken an RDF at least that recently.

mikeD

5:40 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



how did michael jackson do in the pr update

rfgdxm1

5:45 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Putting a date on it - an editor who was awarded a new cat on Oct 26th is showing in directory-ex - so the update must have taken an RDF at least that recently.

Which means that this is a very fresh copy. What I don't understand is why Google took so long? It just seems very un-Googly to me for Google to do such a crummy job keeping the directory updated. Also odd in that the Google advice for webmaster's page specifically recommends submitting to the ODP. Which means at the rate Google has been updating their directory, even if the webmaster lucks out and an editor reviews and adds their site in a days, it could be many moons before it shows in the Google directory. What this suggests to me is Google considers their directory to be a very low priority.

pleeker

5:57 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What this suggests to me is Google considers their directory to be a very low priority.

I agree, but it may also mean that priority is changing now. Regular updates of the RDF would be a nice addition.

Yidaki

7:27 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>If Google only partially crawled the ODP, then backlinks you'd expect to be showing may not show.

Yep, didn't think about checking the cached date of the dmoz categoryies at google - thanks for the hint, rfg. Actually the three different categories i watch were indexed 10th July (before my sites were added). Your stickied example was 5th October. So fact is obviously: google didn't do a full crawl of the odp since months but a partial crawl of various categories.

The new sites (the ones that were first time found now by g through a crawl of the dmoz cats) are currently increasing their ranking from minute to minute. Still no category tag showing but the pr and all other factors obviously get computed step by step now - the pages move up and up.

rfgdxm1

8:07 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can confirm what Yidaki posted. That is a *really* stale cache. Googlebot usually grabs at least the home page of my sites daily. Either Google hasn't been fully crawling the ODP, or Google had a data loss.

tomasz

8:13 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My site url has been changed by editor thru dmoz forum on October 27th and it is in new directory
all happy!

g1smd

8:52 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The directory-ex is still showing the new copy.

The new copy is from the RDF dump of 2003-10-29.

That RDF dump includes all edits up until about 2003-10-25, and some edits from the next four days after that.

The RDF takes four days to compile. Each category has a "snapshot" taken in turn. So, if your category was the first to be indexed, then nothing after 2003-10-25 in that category, would have made it into the RDF. If your category was the last to be indexed, then some late edits all the way up to 2003-10-29 may be in that RDF file.

The directory-in has now reverted to the old version again.

Did anyone else see the wierdness last night, where directory-in just returned the single word ok (with no HTML tags at all) instead of a full page of HTML code? There was no Google content, just the single word ok. I have kept a screen dump of it.

coconutz

9:10 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>Did anyone else see the wierdness last night

Yea, but it was sporadic. If I refreshed the page it would display properly.

mikeD

9:22 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber.

GreatVista

11:28 pm on Nov 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When will the directory tab appear in SERPs?

g1smd

12:15 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> When will the directory tab appear in SERPs? <<

If, by Directory Tab you mean the Category Link that sometimes appears below a site listing in Google SERPS, this link indicating which directory category the site is in, then, for many sites, the Directory Tab already appeared in the SERPs back in July or August or so. However, that link was often pointing to either a category that did not include the site anywhere in the directory (certainly not in the indicated category), or, in some cases was pointing to a category that did not yet exist in the Google Directory at all. Google is just playing catchup now, and joining all the dots up, some 4 or 5 months later.

If you mean something else, then repost the question.

abates

2:02 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When will the toolbar show the changes? :)

One of my sites which changed urls is now in the directory with the new URL, but the category button doesn't light up when I visit it...

I'm not majorly fussed about it - just wondering.

steveb

2:20 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Could be tomorrow... could be seven more months...

gefilte

2:59 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have a question along these lines:
I have an index page widgets.com/index.html
It is purely a listing of links to all my pages. It is linked to from the hompage and all the pages. Whether that makes it a sitemap or an index I'm unsure of the technical difference.
My problem is Google won't index it. My homepage is in google, as are several other pages, but not the index. Previously people on Webmasterworld suggested splitting the index as it had over a 100 links (all internal). I did this about two months ago, but still no change. Does the Google algo dislike index.html pages? I can see no other reason why it wont add my index page.

g1smd

3:33 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What has that got to do with the Google Directory update?

pegaweb

4:08 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oookay I had two listings, and now they're both gone :¦ Any clues?

Dave_Hawley

4:24 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)



What's all the fuss about? Google obviously sees directories as having no value, so why should Webmasters? Check your logs and see just how much traffic directories bring you. The PR gain from DMOZ, or Googles mirror, is no better that PR gain from another webpage. In fact, as you can only use your company name as the anchor text, it's worse than where you can use keywords/prhases for anchor text.

If DMOZ fell off the end of the earth tomorrow, I doubt it would have any real consequences.

Dave

rfgdxm1

4:43 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Google obviously sees directories as having no value, so why should Webmasters?

Then why does Google have a directory at all? Obviously they see it as having value; although I doubt they think the value is very great. However, as the ODP is free, easy to make it profitable.

Dave_Hawley

5:00 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)



Oh come on! Google IS the #1 search engine and it hasn't updated the directory for 6 months or so. That sends out one loud and clear message to me.

A few years ago directories had some value, now, with search results (in particular Google) being so much better, people no longer bother with them. Like I say, check your logs to see the facts.

Dave

quotations

5:03 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>pegaweb
>Oookay I had two listings, and now they're both gone :¦ >Any clues?

No clues, really. I had about 70 listings and all but seven of them have been removed. It appears that some members of this forum who are associated with the ODP tried to remove them all but they failed. Perhaps they will do better next time around?

Dave_Hawley

5:12 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)



RE: I had about 70 listings

LOL, what a great job they do over at DMOZ :)

Dave

opiesilver

5:14 am on Nov 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't know what exactly is being updated, but my PR jumped to 4. I still don't see a result in the SERPs yet, but I'm hoping to soon. The googlebots has been on my site almost daily for the last month. Wonder why they all the sudden do interested? I haven't changed any content in quite a while.
This 125 message thread spans 5 pages: 125