Forum Moderators: open
In my view there are two reasons for this. The first most obvious reason is that Google and Yahoo are very popular.
The second reason is that the other engines/portals are increasingly using Overture, Adwords and Espotting/FindWhat for their listings. I.e. the traffic never gets to our log files unless you pay up!
This pay for click trend has been increasing over the past few years to the decrement of traditional free listings and is set to continue. The 'free' results are now way down the bottom of most pages, on the 2/3rd page or (worst case) gone altogether. This has shifted focus from seo to more business focused skills - advertising, return on investment etc.
Freeserve is a great example of this in the uk - its very popular yet I suspect the log files won't be showing much traffic from it as almost ALL its results are now overture.
I think that this will result in Google accounting for an increasing amount of free traffic - and me getting to know ppc/cpc better than I wanted to :)
BTW PR 6 (if anyone cares anymore about PR :)).
*** July ***
1. microsoft network 48.04%
2. google 35.89%
3. yahoo 10.63%
4. aol netfind 2.44%
5. ask jeeves 1.06%
*** June ***
1. google 56.27%
2. yahoo 21.11%
3. microsoft network 14.54%
4. aol netfind 5.47%
5. overture 0.65%
[edited by: Catnip at 9:51 pm (utc) on July 10, 2003]
Good point - totally agree with you. This drives even more traffic to Google.
I've compiled a list of top sites for doing uk searches on (stats around the start of this year). This is not based on log referals, but on users entering "google"/"google.com"/"google.co.uk" into search engines - which a lot of people do. I've stripped out things I'm not interested in (e.g. if a user was looking for 'msn chat' it was ignored - which heavily effects msn/yahoo's placement).
SearchEnginePercentage
Google42 (.com/.co.uk gives the same results)
Ask.co.uk12
Ask.com10
Yahoo.co.uk8
Yahoo.com7
Msn.com2.5
Lycos.co.uk2
Msn.co.uk2
Freeserve2
Aol.com1
Altavista.com1
(and lots of others below the 1% mark)
The only problem with this is that I have no ideal how accurate it is (several things look out of place)!
Zeal/Looksmart/MSN, Ask and Altavista all can deliver valuable traffic and if you aren't getting any that is a weakness in your business.
Google 74.8
Yahoo 17.4
AOL 2.1
Netscape 0.8
Total 95.1%
My total traffic from all the other search engines goes up each month. But Google's percentage keep climbing.
The reason?
Google crawls my site more completely, more often. I rank on new searches quicker. I am also climbing in the SERPs quicker in Google.
While it is a great idea to diversify, and I recommend that everyone do what they can, the only way I can make strides in increasing the percentage the other search engines give me would be to start blocking Googlebot from large sections of my site.
Where I am diversified is that SEs only account for 42% of all my traffic. The rest are links and bookmarks.
25% [google.com...]
20% [search.yahoo.com...]
20% [search.msn.com...]
2% [aolsearch.aol.com...]
2% [images.google.com...]
1% [google.ca...]
1% [web.ask.com...]
1% [google.com.au...]
1% [kanoodle.com...]
The percentages of total traffic are rough estimates of total traffic.
<addition>
We should mention the PPC ads here. In my case, for a average of all my clients (and specially the prior date figure in my above table) it is not more than 2 or at max 5% to Overture PPC ads.</addition>
[edited by: Allergic at 5:12 am (utc) on July 11, 2003]
So, on this site 100% of my traffic does NOT come from any Google DB. Of course, this will change as soon as Google picks up the site - but no way will Google be over 90% of the traffic. If it is - something's wrong (IMHO).
aroach, Im right about looksmart is delivering results to MSN the main index? and then inktomi come whith the websearch results.
I really don't know. I started getting a lot more MSN traffic when I submitted several content pages to Zeal.
I see a bot named Scooter often but don't know if he's MSN related or not.
Factors:
1. Size of the site
Whilst Google and Alltheweb will index nearly every page of my approx. 3000 page website, Altavista stops at a third and inktomi at half.
I'd say it would be easier to have a 100 page website nearly fully listed in all search engines. Also pay for spidering/listing becomes more realistic.
2. Nature of the website
My audience are engineers, they tend to be Google users (early adapters and acknowledgers of the better quality of Google), I would also say these type of searchers would probably use multi-word search queries more often and therefore a larger site would benefit of more internal entry page-visits.
3. Language(s) of the site
As bilalak mentions, some countries are total Google addicts.
4. MSN - Zeus
Zeus is fine for non-profit promotion - useless for profit-product pages.
I have 90+% referrals from Google/Yahoo/AOL since about 6 months and I'd say nothing to worry about for a well established site, because if ATW, INK or future MSN would capture market share from Google, rankings would tend to be the same anyway - as algos converge.
I'd say, for a bigger site, with english content and an international B2B outlook, if you don't have 90% of SE referrals from Google and its partners - you do not court well to Google or you are a big PPC/PFI spender ;)