Forum Moderators: open
My worry is that Google may decide that I'm running a bunch of duplicates or doorways, and cut me off.
Am I just naive and paranoid, or is this a valid concern?
thanks,
Chris R.
100% sure. The bot is asking specifically for the codes I use to track the different ads, all in sequence.
What happened to you, and what advice can you give me? Should I get rid of the tracking URLs in my Adwords?
thanks,
Chris
*grumble* how is an honest advertiser supposed to track their furshlugginner sales... (rhetorical question)
1) If Google can't even sort out tracking URL's without penalizing the advertisers (especially since they run AdWords), heaven help us all.
2) This is not healthy...i.e., that anyone is suspending use of an important marketing tool, for fear of Google reprisal.
I don't see using tracking urls in AdWords (or any other PPC) as a way of inviting a penalty. I have used them on over 200 sites since the dawn of adwords and have never had a problem.
I don't use tracking urls on spidered links to avoid any possible problems. I use scripts to track them.
That is interesting NFFC that your competitor's adword url got picked up.
I added links from an ad source
[mysite.com...]
THAT page got picked up somehow instead of the main page-
[mysite.com...]
As a result, ONE of my sites was banned as a duplicate of the other.* Suddenly, just the [mysite.com...] was showing up in Google.
Since then, we have set up separate SITES for PPC stuff, and the jury is still out (we use a NO CRAWL command for GoogleBots
*From what I could tell...of course, G never admitted banning, but it took a letter to G for re-submission to have it re-appear in their index.
My second question is, if page 1 of the site has a PR4 and inner pages have PR0 or grey bar due to a penalty, can they reachieve PR after a period of time? Due to my lack of knowledge regarding what's considered spam, I had multiple instances of every widget in my inventory, since each widget can be found using various characteristics. I wanted to track how each widget was found by including the desciptive terms used in the url. Hence widget/red/fat/round/1234 led to the same widget as widget/fat/1234...
It seems that if Google comes across a 302, it indexes page content under the URL that sent the 302 - not the destination URL
This is because 302 only means "moved temporarily".
Of course, because Google finds the destination URL through other mechanisms, you end up with a DUPE :(
I have fell foul of this. One of my sites has ended up being indexed under my Adwords tracker URL :(
I just hope Google doesn't end up penalizing me for dupe content because it has ended up spidering and indexing all my different Adwords tracker URLS and seeing the same page but all using a slightly different URL :(
I would be mad if that happened because I am feeding Google $$$$$ with those Adwords, and if i'm not careful their own AI is going to whack my site because of it. :(
THAT page got picked up somehow instead of the main page-
[mysite.com...] >>
Google isn't the only SE to do this; I've seen the same thing happen in AllTheWeb.
In my own work I'm experiencing a real tug-of-war between the desire for tracking and the need to keep variant URLs out of circulation.
However, this raises another concern, these Adwords webpages will have a PR0/gray-bar, so for informed visitors this could look like a negative. :(