Forum Moderators: open
Sharing a link with 60 others, could result in a drop by 2 (5 --> 3). The PR displayed in the toolbar is a whole number, internally it can be a high or a low PR5.
More important is, if the link is a real one, or one through a redirect or some trick with JavaScript or so. In the last case, no PR is transferred.
actually, I thought that G ignores LINKS after #100, not code after 100kb...wrong?
learn something new every day...especially in here...thanks! ;-)
See message 11 in 100 link limit problem - Many pages with well over over this limit [webmasterworld.com] where GoogleGuy wrote:
100 links is a good soft limit, but 100K is a hard limit. All pages should be shorted than that.
The 100 link thing is different. There's some threshold (maybe 100), beyond which all of those links get less PR than the normal ((1-d) rawPR / numlinks).
PR5 site with 60 links on it
If it's a PR5 page with 60 links on it, then according to my figures you get PR3 or PR4 from it, depending on how high the PR5 is. Many people have figures that would indicate a greater loss.
Google site says (as I'm sure you know):
Design and Content Guidelines:
*Offer a site map to your users with links that point to the important parts of your site. If the site map is larger than 100 or so links, you may want to break the site map into separate pages.
*Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number (fewer than 100).
Given this guideline, plus GG's comment as pointed out by tagaki above, do we think that Google just reduces the importance of the links it sees that are beyond link #100 on a page, but may still index them (assuming the page content remains beneath 100K)?