Forum Moderators: open
-mrbrad
[webmasterworld.com...]
From what GG wrote, if it has a new owner then the link should be ignored. The problem case would seem to be where the new owner puts up a site on the same subject matter, and thus the ODP listing makes sense.
Yup. I got screwed because I bought domain names to fit my content and some of them happened to have been owned before. So, for example, I bought BlueWidgets.com because I had blue widgets to sell. I got my own backlinks, yet I was still screwed. A stupid shortsighted decision on Google's part that punished innocent webmasters.
Expired domains which have been taken over and had the subject matter completely changed are still to be found in DMOZ under incorrect categories.
I wonder how Google sorts that out?
Google has nothing to do with this.
Contact the dmoz editor of the cat under which the site is listed (or any meta editor), and the site should be deleted promptly.
New backlinks should be counted. Where the problem comes up is with the ODP, if you sell blue widgets at BlueWidgets.com, and the former domain name owner was in the ODP blue widgets cat, then that is the right cat for your new site. Thus, your ODP link will never count for all time.
They aren't. I had four expired domains that were PR4 or PR5. The PR4s are all PR0. The PR5 is a PR1. They all had legitimate new backlinks of PR4 and above. One domain was a company name, selling that company's products. It's now a PR0.
Clearly the algorithm that went into place to punish the ODP squatters (we know who they are), cast too wide a net.