The reason I started thinking about this is that it occurred to me that when *I* look at the ads in Google now, I don't just look (or click) on the top ones, I look all the way down the list before fishing out the most likely ones. But I don't know if that is becoming common behavior, or just something I do because I'm in the other end of the PPC business as well.
Of course, the fact that the top positions get resold to AOL and other sites is a pretty strong argument for maintaining a presence on top - I'm not even sure if it's still limited to the top three or if they go down further now.
(I haven't used the new positioning tool - from what I read in the docs about it, it seems too imprecise for what I want)
Just wondering what others think...?
Well, I've just set position preference for some ads that I'm very price-sensitive on.
I've excluded the top position since I often don't even notice it myself when searching, and I've excluded very low positions as simply diluting my CTR. I seem to be getting positive results so far, but I'm <24hrs into this experiment.
Rgds
Damon
The problem I have is a page that for whatever reasons, doesn't convert terribly well anymore. We have to work on that, but in the meantime, it doesn't make sense to pay huge top-three-spot CPCs for clicks that aren't converting as well as we'd like. It seems to me that as long as I keep position on the first page (i.e. #8 or above) I get about the same conversion rate; the CPC is less than half - and because my daily budget isn't being eaten up so quickly that it runs out before the end of the day, I am getting about three times as many clicks. Net result seems to be more sales for less cost.