Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Slow ad approval

Anyone experiencing this?

         

rbacal

2:47 am on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)



Seems to me that approval of our ads (both site targeted and keyword) is quite slow -- certainly way too slow for our taste. We're trying to test out various approaches including image ads on the content network, and I'd love to get this going, but I can't wait weeks for approval, or I'll be "experimenting" on the same variables next March.

I'm giving things until tomorrow a.m. and I guess if ad approval hasn't happened by then, we're just going to turn off all our ads until things improve.

Anyway, is it just us? What are you guys getting in terms of approval time? If approval is typically over a week, we'll just permanently shut down all our content network ads.

deep_alley

6:37 am on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, dont usually have to wait for weeks, unless there is a problem. You can contact adwords support and find out whats taking so long.

vanillaice

7:38 am on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



My approvals have been terribly slow lately. Waiting a week so far on one campaign.

sharewarepro

2:04 pm on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Contact them through your account. That usually speeds things up nicely.

Nancy99

7:46 pm on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes I am seeing this across the board. It used to be that a new account we set up would start showing impressions and clicks in 15 minutes. Now it can take as long as a week and sometimes only after we prod AdWords to say what's up.

jam2005

7:48 pm on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I created an ad that needed approval for an exception last night and it was active this morning.

AdWordsAdvisor

10:01 pm on Mar 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In the big picture, as AdWords earns more advertisers, and these advertisers get more sophisticated, then more ads are created and/or edited. Maybe even lots more. ;)

There have been a lot of new and edited ads hitting the approval queues in recent weeks - and you may be assured that we are working hard (in all the appropriate ways) to get ahead of this curve.

That said, I do certainly apologize if ad approval has been taking longer of late.

AWA

rbacal

12:21 am on Mar 15, 2006 (gmt 0)



There have been a lot of new and edited ads hitting the approval queues in recent weeks - and you may be assured that we are working hard (in all the appropriate ways) to get ahead of this curve.

That said, I do certainly apologize if ad approval has been taking longer of late.

Thanks AWA. I sent if an email earlier today.

Reasons for the slow response time (if that's actually happening) aside, a slow approval rate simply doesn't allow us to do what we want with image ads and site targeting. The two major variables we need to play with are the actual image ads (varying on size and content), and the actual sites targeted (if we're looking at the latter).

If it's going to take us a week+ to get ads approved the do-evaluate-redo cycle becomes way too long and arduous to justify the investment of time into the content network.

The OTHER point I just HAVE to make is that since you are vetting the ads, and it's a slow process, why am I seeing ads in both the serp pages, and my own site for generic, junk sites that are simply targeting with wildcard type keywords?

We're kind of losing on all sides. The approval process takes a long time on the advertiser side, BUT the quality of the ads I'm seeing (both on my site and on the SERPS) is just horrible.

It's getting a little bizarre, and the junk ads that have been approved (hence they appeared on my sites) are lowering the value of adwords to visitors in general.

venrooy

1:06 am on Mar 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I for one also hope that approval times speed up. Like the op said, it makes it impossible to do any testing. The main reason I was attracted to google in the first place was the fact that I could do quick A-B testing.

This is becoming abundantly frustrating. Some of my ads will not show for weeks - and then miraculously appear a few hours after I contact my ad rep.

Something needs to be done to give those with a clean history - more leway.

The ability to focus on customers that want what you have is what made google so big. Without quick A-B testing a lot of that focus is lost.

rbacal

5:34 am on Mar 15, 2006 (gmt 0)



The ability to focus on customers that want what you have is what made google so big. Without quick A-B testing a lot of that focus is lost.

So true. I just turned off more of our content site targeted campaigns, since all I was doing was burning money, basically.

If our ROI was decent, (that's not Google's responsibility), I might be more patient. I'll think on things a day or two to decide if we should terminate all content site ads.

Our plans were to ramp up...sigh.

Side note: With site targeting it appears one can only target a SINGLE section or page rather than a number of them on a site. That's another reason we're just thinking of shutting down our hoped to be experiment.

I imagine one could get around that by setting up different campaigns, but that would involve creating the creatives, and...guess what? Waiting for approval.

Loki99

3:10 pm on Mar 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Another TOO SLOW TO TEST opinion

We've started looking at alternative places to advertise.

Our March Madness image campaign is dead in the water w/google.

Test, measure, an adjust. Is affected by TIME.

humblebeginnings

6:23 pm on Mar 15, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Today one of the campaigns I started 3 days ago was approved. Rather slow....