Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

What did Google achieve by implementing the new pricing policy?

so people now create multiple accounts...

         

bcc1234

12:01 am on Sep 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Whom does it help?

Now, I have to monitor an extra account, and Google has an extra account to administer and bill.

Now what?

Did they really think people would pay $5 per click instead of creating another account and paying $0.05 for the same exact keyword with the same ad copy? Throw in another domain and you are set.

I understand the concept of credit score and driving record. Those work great because it's illegal to acquire another SS# just to start fresh.

But last time I checked, Google didn't rule the world quite yet. I know they are planning to, but until they actually do rule the world and pass laws, factoring the domain name and account history in the pricing calculations is not a smart thing to do.

mhhfive

1:20 am on Sep 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, on the bright side, Google is now allowing advertisers to use previously "on hold/in trial" keywords...

I think the other side effects might be that Yahoo may institute similar "opaque" methods for keyword bidding and pricing. So 2nd tier PPC programs might have a fighting chance to move up in the world by focusing on simple pricing structures -- in a "you get what you pay for" manner. I think Ask Jeeves is sorta doing that by copying Google's old system.

any other predictions?

bcc1234

1:36 am on Sep 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, on the bright side, Google is now allowing advertisers to use previously "on hold/in trial" keywords...

That's all pretty cool and I'm not against the change, but against factoring the account history into it.

I could even understand using the previous bidding history on per-domain basis, but extending it to the whole account is not right.