.
"I'm gonna put my money into OV...I'm gonna put my money into AW..." does not constitute a good thread unless you have shares in arbitrage inc.
Never mind...I get it; ...that's good enough for me.
Enlighten us as to how the behemoths will quack over their Lafite '61 because of your...
There are smaller SEs, but results from them are apparently mixed, and word has it that some are rife with click fraud. Probably the best bet is to wait till MSN begins paid search, which should be fairly soon. (Oh, the irony of looking to Microsoft to save us from Google . . . or anything . . .)
I pulled my spend to make a statement. I also let them know I took it to their competitor. If others would do the same maybe they would wake up a realize that we all expect a clean SE that contains no span, can eliminate 301 redirects easily, and doesn't confuse URLs without the 'www' and those that have it as two different sites. Hello, if I was building a "google" these are the basics that I'd handle during indexing.
How easy is it to realize that if you have the same domain page cached 11 times and the only variations are URL variables or something else as mentioned above, then they are probably the same page, right?
I'd love to hear more are doing the same. With some numbers we can impact change.