Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: buckworks & eWhisper & skibum

Google Advertiser Breaking the Double Serving Rules

7:36 pm on Dec 9, 2018 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 27, 2005
votes: 3

Wanted to see what others think of what I see going on with Adwords.

A newspaper company that owns many newspapers bought out a review site. They copied the content of the review site to all of their newspapers, using a subdomain of each news site. Advertising on google for the same keyword using 7 different accounts. This all started this past summer.

Bottom line is that they are showing up with as many as 7 ads for the same keyword, with duplicate content on each of the landing pages of the original review site (that they bought out) on each newspaper subdomain site. They dominate each keyword, cluttering it up with their ads.

This is a clear violation of the double serving rule. They are an affiliate site as well.

Anyone on here advertising on merchandise has probably seen what I am talking about. What can be done? I have personally reported this many times, yet the problem persists. Google does not seem to care to enforce their own rules.
9:10 am on Dec 27, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member ogletree is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 14, 2003
posts: 4318
votes: 41

Google rarely does anything about that kind of thing especially when it is a big company. I'm not even sure why they have rules. They don't seem to enforce them.
6:04 pm on Dec 27, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 20, 2006
votes: 63

"This is a clear violation of the double serving rule."

In my view, things have gotten muddy over the years (but for good reason).
Many years ago, it was enforced to a degree that was way over zealous policing, lifetime bans with no chance to appeal.
Then, they added about four or five rules about pricing, ownership, support, biz model, etc., to make it clear when two different domains were considered to be double / overlapping.
Today, I don't think you can even find a policy or rule called "double serving", but G relies on more broadly defined standards, like transparency and fairness.

See "Unfair Advantage" here:

If you do report a party for doing double serving type activity, G knows that legal arguments could entangle many parties, so they tend to not comment on cases, or follow-up.
I think this can be frustrating, but if you've ever been entangled in any legal cases, like I have, you'll come to see G's treatment as having an upside for you.

I've also been doing this long enough, that when I see true shenanigans going on, I know it won't last forever, even if not enforced (in your view).
People who resort to unfair tactics, usually aren't the competitors to be feared.

This topic can be toxic, so I rarely comment on it, people's ideas of fairness do differ.
And when one is impacted by it, it can feel very weighty.
A broad view, especially on price / service / support / availability / etc, should be taken - if the consumer reasonably feels that two choices are different, chances are very good, that G will conclude the same thing.