Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Unethical or just good business?

2 sites dominate adwords

         

Jez123

4:48 pm on Jul 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This seems a bit odd to me - I don't know if it's unethical or if it's simply a good business practise.

A business in my SERPS has 2 different but similar sites that they dominate the top 2 spots in the same SERP in adwords. Firstly I thought they were mad but they seem to be having some impact on the other sites in the SERP as they are getting a lot of the business.

I don't know where google stand on this practise. As I said, I thought that they were crazy as it must cost a fortune to dominate the top positions like that. I wonder if they were, perhaps in trouble with the business, were thinking that they would be made bankrupt, set up new business name and web site and google identity (as is the norm in the UK seemingly) and inadvertently stumbled on the fact that 2 high cost ad campaigns for the same keyword are worthwhile.

Please comment if you have seen or heard of this before and if you think it's within google's guidelines. I suspect it is if they are paying up and the sites are different etc. but I am curious. I already have heard one of my competitors is thinking of following suite.

alexsel

5:09 pm on Jul 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It's buying up shelf space, nothing mad about it. If both sites are e-commerce but their inventory differs, it's within Google's guidelines to advertise both concurrently. There's a double ad serving 80/20 rule that says if the inventory on both sites correlate by above 80%, meaning if more than 80% of their inventory is the same, Google ad policy team may deem it double ad serving, at which point you will have to pause one of your ads.