Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Determing CPCs

Don't understand AWAs numbers

         

roundabout

7:02 pm on Jan 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm fairly new to Adwords, so I have been reading everything I can to get up to speed. Thought I had things figured out, but then I came across this thread: [webmasterworld.com...]

Look at AWA's indication of the sample CPCs in message 11 of that post ... do those seem correct? I don't understand why the CPCs aren't one cent above the next competitors highest bid. (My understanding is that they should be .71, .51, .11, .05 instead of the indicated: .47, .26, .11, .05)

What am I missing?

FromRocky

7:14 pm on Jan 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



do those seem correct?

Yes, they're.

What am I missing?

Yes, you misunderstood the AdWords concept. This is AdWords not Overture. You believe that the CPCs are one cent above the next competitors highest bid. They're not. It's based on the rank number (Max. CPC x CTR) not the highest bid. You should use the rank number is 0.01 above the next competitors highest rank number.

So: your Actual Cost = [your next highest Rank number+0.01] over [your CTR]

roundabout

8:51 pm on Jan 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks a ton Rocky ... you really know this topic.

So it appears that increasing the click thru rate can really increase your ROI. In the example, if A increases his CTR by 1%, he would pay only .35 for the top spot, instead of .47

Interesting stuff ...

FromRocky

7:55 pm on Jan 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



you really know this topic.

Just a couple of months ahead of you. You will get there soon.

So it appears that increasing the click thru rate can really increase your ROI. In the example, if A increases his CTR by 1%, he would pay only .35 for the top spot, instead of .47

Interesting stuff ...

You're right on!