Just yesterday I wanted to run some test and swapped out non-essential word X from the ad with non-essential word Y from the ad.
Low and behold, the cpc on the new ad was 2-4 times higher on every new ad. Even if they had the same or better CTR. Keywords are all still 10/10.
When I check ad variations, the old ad does as it did before, but the new one costs too much. That's too bad, because some of them got even more clicks.
So what's the lesson here? Don't bother trying to improve your ads if the old ones are doing fine. 100% of the time the cpc ridiculously. What a joke.
dpam, that's not an option. Need the bid sufficiently high to keep the spot.
Also, some terms that generate adsense clicks worth 5 cents or less 100% of the time still cost 1.50 or more to advertise on.
If you completely create a word, complete typo - non existent word, you are still needing to pay a lot to advertise for that typo even if nobody else is paying for it.
And another thing I don't understand is why you are charged different amounts per click based on how much you bid...
example - 10,000 clicks each:
You bid 10 cents for a term, cost average is 9 cents per click.
You bid 15 cents for the same term, cost average is 12 cents per click.
You bid 25 cents for that term, cost average drops to 8 cents per click?
Then out of the blue you are told you need to increase even more ?
I've done controlled tests... the results don't always follow logic.
example - 10,000 clicks each:
You bid 10 cents for a term, cost average is 9 cents per click.
You bid 15 cents for the same term, cost average is 12 cents per click.
You bid 25 cents for that term, cost average drops to 8 cents per click?
I don't think you can understand such numbers unless you know what the competition is doing, both in terms of bids, and whether they are jumping in and jumping out.
I think a lot of people get confused and forget that what they actually pay is heavily influenced (up to the max bid), by what everyone else is doing.
So, it appears it isn't logical. I'm not sure if it actually is logical, but I know we can't really know until we have the info. google has, which we don't.
If you want to do a brain teaser, see if you can work out a scenario that explains the data you have, if you start considering the competition behavior (you can do this without actually knowing, just to find out if it's possible that's the issue).