I'm wondering about Minimum CPC and Quality Score. Specifically, the Poor Quality Scores.
In looking over various accounts for myself and my clients, I see that even though a keyword has a QS of "Poor" the minimum bid can be as low as $.40; almost all the ones I see have minimum bids of $.40, $.50 or in rare cases, $1.00. I have *one* keyword (out of about 6500) with a minimum bid of $5.00. I've heard of minimum bids of $10.00, but never gotten one. So why the disparity? Are some Quality Scores poorer than others? Is it taking Account QS into the calculation?
Recently I had a keyword with a QS of "Poor" and a minimum bid of $1.00 suddenly drop down to a minimum bid of $.40. I hadn't done a thing to the landing page, ad group, match type, bid, or ad, and the QS was still "Poor" - so why the change? Was it suddenly a little more relevant but still not quite enough to slide over into "Ok"?
We've been analysing minCPC behaviour for various clients over the last 6 months, but there seems to be very little pattern or consistency mainly b/c parameters such as 'landing page' are hard to quantify.
Given the various comments i read from adwords users on the enigma that is the minCPC, i'd say the algorithm is still not stable...