Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google AdWords New Preferred Cost Bidding

         

limoshawn

7:44 pm on Apr 17, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



from [adwords.blogspot.com ]

Today, we are introducing a new bidding option called preferred cost bidding -- a feature designed to help you save time while achieving your advertising cost goals more consistently. Instead of setting a maximum cost-per-click (CPC) or cost-per-impression (CPM) bid, you can set a preferred CPC or CPM bid that represents the average price you want to pay.

And the water gets a little more muddy.

Hiccup

6:50 am on Apr 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, google did slip up a bit, see wall street likes consistently increasing profits. Google jumped out of the gate and continued to climb a bit too fast. Now they have to come with "creative" ways to help us all spend more money with them.

This new wonderful tool was never intended for affiliate marketers. It was always targetted directly at the big companies who still haven't figured out that adwords shouldn't be used for pure branding purposes.

Those big companies have big budgets, but dont' really know how to utilize adwords to increase their profits. Think about it. Big corporations are run by grandpas who never grew up with the interent. They still believe you can't make money on it, but since their competitors advertise on it, they must have to as well.

So good work google, you do a great job of focussing on your big accounts and giving them whatever they want.

Am I close?

LOL

RhinoFish

6:56 pm on Apr 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"This new wonderful tool was never intended for affiliate marketers."
How does this tool create any disadvantage for an affiliate? Please be specific.

"Big corporations are run by grandpas who never grew up with the interent."
This is both ridiculous and revealing.

"Am I close?"
Yes, to becoming blind from fear of change.

aeiouy

4:54 am on Apr 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Actually he has a good point. Big companies with a long history used to advertising in traditional mediums such as tv and radio are used to spending huge budgets with no real way to tell if their marketing is actually working. They just spend it because they believe they need to spend it.

It has been a pretty cushy set up for tv and radio stations for years.

RhinoFish

3:59 pm on Apr 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"Actually he has a good point. Big companies with a long history used to advertising in traditional mediums such as tv and radio are used to spending huge budgets with no real way to tell if their marketing is actually working. They just spend it because they believe they need to spend it."

I agree, big companies have deep pockets and sometimes pay for ads resulting in a negative roi. And that is definitely hard to compete against as an affiliate. But G didn't create that situation nor does it cater to it. In traditional mediums, a small one-man affiliate could never hope to sign a contract with an ad firm (or tv network or newspaper or radio station) and spend money even if they wanted to... now, an affiliate can start at $1 a day if they want - no barrier to entry. And they can reach out to any audience, including online, radio, mags, newspapaers, tv and more. And, since relevance and quality matter, it's an easy thing to find an angle, like features and price comparisons, that people search for, that merchants themselves can't provide as well as an affiliate can. So I continue to assert that adwords has swung the door open for affiliates to compete head-to-head against the super big guys and GET YOUR ADS SHOWN. This was not possible years ago. And the bidding feature added to G, that we're discussing here, gives no advantage to anyone because they're big or have deep budgets.

limoshawn

4:45 pm on Apr 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



gives no advantage to anyone

No advantage to anyone except Google.

This 35 message thread spans 2 pages: 35