Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.159.50.111

Forum Moderators: buckworks & eWhisper & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Well done on the Quality Score

     
8:32 am on Nov 28, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 11, 2006
posts:52
votes: 0


Just a quick open post to say a big well done to Google on the QS adjustments they have made in making the marketplace and results better....I jest.

This is a joke; my very own brand terms now cost me in the region of $5.00 and that's still not good enough to get me into the top three spots which are as follows...

1) A Loans Company - my sector and product has absolutley nothing to do with loans.

2)eBay - wow there's a surprise Google; that sure is targeted and gives the consumer choice; ANOTHER SODDING EBAY AD!

3) An arb. site with sick rubbish content

So all in all well done Google; you should be very, very proud.

Calc

8:50 am on Nov 28, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 1, 2002
posts:1580
votes: 0


Yeah.....I feel your pain!

So take it legal!

I searched for a cell phone network tonight on G! and the ads. were appalling. If I search for a Trademark owner then I should be able to find it surely? (at least in AdWords)

Making the TM holder pay to protect his good name IMHO is a form of extortion! Does the USA not have laws against this?

I hate lawyers, but, once in a while there is some good they could do! So let's see one of you take on something worthy for a change!

8:26 pm on Nov 28, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 27, 2002
posts:58
votes: 0


Had the same thing for a big (A)dsl company and their brand name in Europe.
But what the heck buy Google stock so if the prices of your ads go up your stock will also :-)
1:04 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Sept 14, 2006
posts:72
votes: 0


trademark... you'll be able to set cpc pretty low ;)
2:03 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2006
posts:1878
votes: 5


and G's algorithm will make the clicks a fraction of that low bid max CPC too. your tm-type stuff's roi should be astronomical.

claiming G forces you to do any advertising is, of course, incorrect. if you don't want to, don't.

2:11 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2006
posts:1536
votes: 0


Flow with the river. Make the changes Google wants and hints at. You got to experiment and try to 'improve quality' as google perceives it.

That is the way.

3:29 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 11, 2006
posts:52
votes: 0


Thanks for the comments; I'm all over it.
3:32 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 1, 2004
posts:81
votes: 0


yup and with the new QS update on the way you will be classed out of traffic at any price anyway.
3:36 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 23, 2003
posts:353
votes: 0


what do you mean Magic?
6:09 pm on Dec 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 1, 2004
posts:81
votes: 0


There was an interview on traffick blog with Nick Fox about how poor quality scores will now have implications on the ad ranking algo in adwords. Basically your ads will be penalised position wise too, I guess the worse it is the further you drop. That along with worse and worse tail matching for poor qs broad matched keywords.