Over the last week I've been working on a new Adwords campaign for a new client and I grow more frustrated every time I work on it. The minimum bid thingie makes uninformed and sometimes stupid decisions ... at least they certainly seem stupid from here.
Example: it makes good sense for an advertiser to bid on common misspellings of targeted searches, but Adwords requires significantly higher bids for close-but-not-quite misspellings, or for other variants such as differences between US and Canadian spellings.
Also, it doesn't seem to understand that when a specific landing page is set for a specific search term it ought to assess how well that page relates to that term, not just judge by the main landing page for the campaign as a whole.
Grrrr ...
Landing pages are meant to increase ROI. That is why we test. Google is imposing a system that may not lead to higher ROI, but lower. This in turn will make advertisers pay LESS for clicks, since they make less.
If only Yahoo wasn't so greedy and inept, and if only MSN wasn't so clueless..
Oh well.
It would be far better if Google would officially, not buried on forums, say this works and this does not. I think it is time for AWA to step up and clarify this. If it entails a massive corporate policy change, then I suggest AWA lobby for it.
NOBODY, has a problem with Google running its business in such a manner that dictates - if you "xyz" you will have minimum bids of $10.00. Clarity, after all the gas on these forums, is what is required.
Little do they know that the landing pages reconfigure themselves based on the referrer information when coming in through search or adwords click.. text blocks and additional links are added right at the top.. But they never see it so I'm screwed.
Come on google - you can do better than this.