Should I cut down the number of ads being split-tested to say.. 3? Then after that, pick the best and add 2 more new variations? And so on.. rather than testing all "thinkable" variations all at once?
Maybe, at first pick 3 very different approach ads. Then get more and more "detailed"... each picking the best performing ad and trying progressivelly more and more micro-level variations on it?
WHat's the optimal way?