Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Are you pulling back on AdWords/OV bid prices

or battling for the top spots?

         

skibum

9:27 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Lately the amount of traffic coming from Google via AdWords is staggering, in some cases, so much so that we don't want it all, or rather we do, but the ROI is not there to make it worth paying for.

Sometimes, especially for high ticket items there don't seem to be any real patterns for picking out the real "money" keywords so "optimization" is somewhat of a shot in the dark.

The solution so far has been to reduce bid prices, have lower rankings in the ad listings, and get more traffic and better ROI for the same ad spend.

A similar strategy is being tested on Overture. With ads up top and on the side on Yahoo! & MSN, why pay to be in the top-3 listings? Traffic stays about the same while CPC goes down and ROI goes up.

Anyone else finding it more beneficial to be lower in the rankings, not just due to lower bid prices but for higher conversion rates and better ROI as well?

madman21

9:30 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes. My ROI seems to be better the lower my ad is. If people are willing to look through that much crap and click on an ad they must be "serious".

Robsp

9:33 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yep, lower spot have better ROI in general. There are ofcourse exceptions but overall this is the case in my campaigns.

If everyone now starts shooting for those spots we'll all pay a lot less than we do now :)

eWhisper

9:42 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



When Y! changed their listings to include more ads, I found that I really liked the first or second box ad (usually position 6-7 on the page) for high ROI.

For some companies, the sheer volume that the first couple of positions receives more than pays for the top spot, lower ROI, but more total visitors takes care of that.

I'm still holding my tongue on G until after I see the numbers for at least a week with the new format.

cline

10:18 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Since about the first of the year I've been seeing the same thing on several of my clients' accounts. Search traffic is way up. That would be good, but the quality of the traffic is falling. I've been taking down bids, and in some cases even ad groups, that were working well just a few months ago.

digitalv

10:32 pm on Mar 31, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I always keep top placement, but what is best for YOU depends on the products you're selling.

I used to jump back and forth on this ... Sometimes I would put all of my keywords to the top position and keep them there for a while. Other times, I'll scale back and let them ride lower on the page.

What I found was that when the ads were lower, I was spending less and getting fewer visitors, but a higher percentage turned into sales. When the ads were higher, I was spending more money, getting more visitors, and MORE sales, but a lesser PERCENTAGE of buyers than with the low position.

For me, the percentage didn't matter, how many actual sales I get is what matters. I spend 10k - 12k a month on AdWords and another 7k - 8k on Overture to stay on top, but my average sale is around $2,500. Paying a couple of dollars a click doesn't really matter.

If I were selling less expensive items though, or items that were'nt hot sellers and purchased all the time like what I'm selling now, I would probably want to stay lower and think about ROI. So that's why I say it depends on what you're selling, specifically how much it costs.

kwasher

4:15 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




I dont like position #1, but I really like #2, #3, #4 , #5 and #10, #11, #12, #13. Yes, page two.... I think a lot of people who dont look at ads on the first page (because they are looking to the regular listings), if they dont find what they want, they click to page two - and become more receptive to the ads (since page one didnt give them instant gratification).

Tropical Island

4:34 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I hate #1 for PPC.

I love #2 or #3. Lower than that I find the traffic falls off too much.

The #1 spot draws too much casual traffic.

TomWaits

5:24 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What digitalv said. Very well said.

GeekyChic

5:46 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Pretty much everyone here covered it... #1 position is great to brand yourself, but people like a bargain and they're going to shopped around. Unless you offer lower prices or a longer warranty, they come back. #2 and #3 are good too, but if you're showing up as #1 on the SERP then you don't need to place your ad on the top 3 position. We do this, so if they skip us on top they'll find us on the bottom and vice versa. The amount of money you're willing to spend depend on the products you sell.

eWhisper

6:03 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Pretty much everyone here covered it... #1 position is great to brand yourself, but people like a bargain and they're going to shopped around.

There are some statistics for YP advertising. Now there are of course some differences between YP & SEM, but I think people assume there is more comparision shopping than is actually done.

These are quoted from this page [myprofessionaladvertising.com], however, I've seen these same stats on multiple occasions.

1. 42% of people will contact two or more businesses (meaning 58% of people do not contact more than 1 business) - how good are your landing pages/conversion rates - this is a very imporntant point).
2. 81% of phone book users will make contact with an advertiser.
3. 34% will contact a company they had never contacted before
4. 81% of consumers start at the beginning of the heading when they do not have a business name in mind.

When you consider people start at the top, and many people don't go to a second site if they like the first one, the top few listings can make quite a difference in sales IF you KWs are highly targeted, and you're also not coming up for a lot of info searches where the person doesn't want to spend money - but just learn.

drdsl2000

7:13 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



We see better ROI bidding 5 cents vs $1.00 in our competitive category. We spent alot of time and trial an error to figure this out.

Market demand per day has more impact than bid amount, IMHO.

We have reduced our Adwords spend way down.

Overture's interface for advertisers is so poor compared to Google, that we have stopped the OV account altogether.

Regards,
Craigster

GeekyChic

8:26 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Stats are good to keep in mind... but you have to realize that they are to vague in a sense that it depend on what a person is looking for. I know when it comes to our product that we sell, people look around for the best deals. Our customers tell us. It depends on the product.

johneyyy_d

12:40 pm on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



as a marketing company, i have seen in the last 2 weeks every company which we had 5 cent ad's and were getting 1000+ hits per day go down to 400 or so.
google has changed their algo again but this time it hit us hard, every customer we have as to pay 2 to 5 times more to advertise on google now.

we are now getting ripped.

rich42

9:56 am on Apr 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just hack and slashed adwords cpc from around .12 to about .08

Traffic fall off has been minor, and conversion rate seems the same or maybe better.

I still have my 'golden' keywords that I won't let fall out of top spot - but for everything else cheaper seems better (at least for me).