From what I recall, earlier disapproved ads were commented upon in e-mail, but the reasons were not listed in the AdWords interface.
This new enhancement is much appreciated :)
Oh, and about the disapproved ad? I had mentioned that a product was $249, and the ad was denied because it was actually $249.99. Sheesh :D. Luckily, I still had two characters free on the title line, but I'm wondering what would have happened if i had put $250. Would the AdWords folks have complained about that, too? ;)
for example a non-title line:
"smooth green fluffy widget (aff)"
was no good... it had to be like this:
"smooth green fluffy widget. (aff)"
Ya know grammar and punctuation ;) that's not even a sentence!
What I hate about htis though is, that little fix resets all statistics, as if I deleted and recreated the ad... wish they'd keep the stats for such minoredits...
SN
Oh, and about the disapproved ad? I had mentioned that a product was $249, and the ad was denied because it was actually $249.99. Sheesh :D. Luckily, I still had two characters free on the title line, but I'm wondering what would have happened if i had put $250. Would the AdWords folks have complained about that, too? ;)
Ah, now here is a case where I'd ask you to step out of your perspective as the unlucky advertiser who has to re-write an ad.
Step into your customer's shoes for a moment: do you trust a business that tells you one price in an ad, then a higher price when you get to their site? And, how do you feel?
Another question: do you trust AdWords ads as much as you did before you clicked? I'd guess not.
Now step back into your advertiser perspective, and ask yourself: "Do I care if my customer trusts me?" Also ask: "Do I want people to trust AdWords ads, so that they'll click on mine in the future?".
Personally, If I wanted a click to convert to a customer, you bet I'd care about both of these things.
BTW, if your ad said $250.00, and your site said $249.00, you'd be OK. In this case the customer feels as if they've saved a buck, not been the victim of bait-and-switch. The ad would be approved.
Shak said it too, a while ago: always think like your customer. At least for a while.
AWA
With that said, I can't exactly get my mind around another recent disapproval.
Here's my original ad (with the first two lines changed, but the third copied verbatim):
Fabulous Fluffy Finds
Fine for families, friends, foes
Sign up free with this affiliate!
The disapproval reason listed? "Identify affiliate status."
How much more clear can I make it?! :D
And yes, I did drop a friendly note to the AdWords staff :)
But only twice.
This would be the third time. ;)
Another thought occurs to me though - the ad is a little confusing in the sense that it implies that the site the user is taken to is the affiliate, rather than you. Do you see what I mean?
In other words, just saying 'affiliate' would be short and sweet - and says that the ad was placed by an affiliate.
However, saying "Sign up free with this affiliate!" kind of makes the affiliate thing a big deal, and implies that clicking on the ad sends the user to 'this affiliate'.
I think this is probably what was in the reviewers mind.
Hope that makes sense. Keep in mind, though, that it's late, and I've been drinking coffee all day. ;)
AWA
I think these two quotes summarize a lot about AdWords:
Another question: do you trust AdWords ads as much as you did before you clicked?
Do I want people to trust AdWords ads, so that they'll click on mine in the future?".
Do you mind if I quote your information in this thread to people via the phone who just can't wrap their mind around scrupulous advertising?
If makes it a bit more obvious and let's it stand out more then some wish, but I think it does right by tehcustomer and AdWords.
SN