Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I'm guessing that the higher EPC with the medium rectangle is because it can display image ads, which are presumably bid higher. But I don't understand why the CTR would be lower... perhaps also because image ads get clicked less than text ads?
Since the sizes of these two rectangles aren't that far apart, could there be any other reasons for the discrepancies between EPC/CTR?
> images
Yes, classic banner blindness has lead to a massive declined in image click through rate the last 5 years. 97-00, you could get 20% ctr a lot of times accross a wide network. Today - you are lucky to get 1% average on most notext based gfx.
And you have been testing by exchanging the two in the exact same position? Having you tried moving the location of the ads and swapping them at the new location? What does that do to the ctr.
Yes, the exact same position, even experiented with alternating between the large and medium rectangles, with each assigned to a unique channel. Results are pretty much as described.
CTR is higher with lg rectangle, lower with med rectangle. EPC is the opposite. I may just use eCPM, though I wonder about higher CTR yielding "better" ads eventually.
It maybe that the larger rectangles are showing more ads that are related and therefore they are getting clicked more, but making a lot less.
What are the positioning of your ads?