Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reports show wrong aggregate Page Impressions

channel data is right

         

baze22

12:15 pm on May 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've noticed since around May 4, my Page Impressions when looking at my aggregate numbers shows a low number, but when I look at channels, I show a higher number (more accurate). Click and Earnings remain the same (so I haven't worried about it too much), but it does affect "reported" CTR & CPM in aggregate view as well.

Yesterday's aggregate Page Impressions shows less (~6600) than the page impressions I got for my biggest channel (~9800), much less the combined of all 4 channels.

Just irritating not being able to glance at the aggregate for an accurate view.

Anybody else experiencing this (or did I miss a thread covering it somewhere)?

thanks,

baze

mertero

12:31 pm on May 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



There was an older topic -

[webmasterworld.com...]

But there was no conclusion... This is interesting. Are you using URL or Custom chanenls?

Ron Mertens

[edited by: tedster at 7:31 pm (utc) on Dec. 11, 2005]
[edit reason] remove url [/edit]

baze22

1:23 pm on May 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That older thread doesn't seem to relate to this. My clicks and earnings are the about the same (must have a straggler page somewhere without a channel) in both views, the difference is that the aggregate page impressions is less than when looking at it via channels (custom channels, one for each of 4 sites).

Normally, channels should add up to no more than the aggregate, in this case I even have a single channel greater than the aggregate. This only applies to stats showing as of 5/4/05, stats prior show properly.

baze

baze22

9:30 pm on May 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So am I the only one with this problem? If so, I'll contact G and see what they can tell me. If I'm missing something, I'd love to know about it before I go stick my foot in my mouth in writing. ;)

thanks,

baze