Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

The Switch to CPM Is Awful

CPM Switch is Bad for Publishers and Users

         

Pixby8

12:52 pm on Mar 25, 2025 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



So, I've been out of the Adsense game for the last couple of years, but when using it previously, I had a site in the education niche, and would reliably get over $100 Impression RPM, with CPC in the 1 to 2 dollar range, with just one unobtrusive ad on each page. This made for great user satisfaction and still made me a good deal of income. I come back now, and the results are just awful, like $12 Impression RPM, CPC down in like $0.16 to $0.30 cents range. Like... what in the ever loving world? Then I read that last year Google switched to CPM bids, doing away with CPC. Sure enough, I look at my past data and what used to be 99% CPC is now 100% CPM. Fantastic.

What did this make me do, now that impressions alone are king? Introduce a radically new site design that has many more ads per page, and stretches content across multiple pages unnecessarily, to encourage users to view multiple pages to get the content they want, simply so I could come close to the revenue the CPC model would make me in the past.

The CPM change obviously makes for much worse user satisfaction, and worse site design, because there are a lot more ads, and more pages to sort through.

Which leads me to believe this change was introduced simply to increase Google's overall ad inventory. If the the natural response is that publishers have to implement more ads, to offset the change, that's the only conclusion I can draw.

What a simply terrible change by Google. Whomever came up with the idea to switch is literally an enemy of world.

not2easy

12:59 pm on Mar 25, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Since they are paying for views now, it depends on human traffic more than CPC.

See this discussion on that topic: [webmasterworld.com...]

ember

3:18 pm on Mar 25, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Remember back in 2018 or so when we were supposed to start following IAB ad guidelines (I think that was the group) and could only have so many ads per so much content. Or when Google only allowed so many ads on a page. It was all about limiting ads and improving user experience. What the heck ever happened to all of that? Just good old corporate greed?

bgweb

1:58 pm on Apr 18, 2025 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'm not really sure what it's like in other countries, but in the UK, some local news websites have become more or less unreadable due to the sheer number of ads on the pages. The user experience is truly appalling.

CommandDork

2:52 pm on Apr 18, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The only move they have made that's actually benefitted me is real-time clawbacks instead of the month-end morale-killer.

The CPM switch has not helped publishers.

"Since they are paying for views now, it depends on human traffic more than CPC."

Which is funny considering how hard they are pushing AI and using the snippets to take that human traffic away from us.

gatormark

10:52 pm on Apr 18, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The CPM switch doesn't make sense at all since many websites are so niche-focused. It's amazing to me that the Google people making these changes do not understand the nature of certain websites.

Ninagreece

8:42 pm on Apr 23, 2025 (gmt 0)

Top Contributors Of The Month



they killed us
we must do something