Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.175.173

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

160x600 compared to 300x600

     

avalon37

10:33 pm on Jun 25, 2013 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Anyone have any results in testing the semi new 300x600 versus the standard 160x600? Trying to get a sense before asking my IT dept to code pages for a test.

sgod

12:47 am on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)



We've done a couple of tests of the 300x600, and it's not worked so far. CTR is slightly better than 160x600, but CPC is way down. We've not stuck with it. Others might be having different experiences, though.

netmeg

12:42 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



My 160x600 did better. The 300x600 was just average, and I hated the white space left because it doesn't collapse when they don't fill it with ads (specially on an iPhone or other mobile device; it's even worse)

avalon37

12:48 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Thanks. The white space is a major issue.

netmeg

2:00 pm on Jun 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That's the main reason I stopped running em.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month