Forum Moderators: martinibuster
How has it been for you? Anyone really happy on the money side of things?
As a search tool I realize the brand recognition as being important for my users. Although the tool I used before (atomz) provided much better customization, design-wise but also (always liked that) scaling importance of the various page elements and tags as ranking triggers.
So, after a couple of months I think I will go back to my old engine...
I am also thinking about going back to Atomz, which was my previous search function. The problem isn't just that the income is small, but the results pages can end up dominated by the Google ads. I did a test search which brought up ONE page on my site, sitting between FOUR Google ads above it and four more below it.
The problem is, I read somewhere that Atomz now is running Google ads on the results pages if you belong to their free service! Of course, they may be less obtrusive... Something to check into.
If you have a search site or a portal it may make sense but if you run a content site it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
If you have a search site or a portal it may make sense but if you run a content site it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
As the expression goes, "your mileage may vary." My search mileage, in terms of CTR and CPM, has been better than my CTR and CPM for content ads--and I've got an editorial site.
The problem is, I read somewhere that Atomz now is running Google ads on the results pages if you belong to their free service! Of course, they may be less obtrusive... Something to check into.
They are now showing ads on the free service, which can of course distract from your own search results.
Must admit that I have stuck with Atomz as they allow you to customise your search results to fit in with the rest of your site, which I understand is not the case with Google yet.
How obtrusive are the ads on Atomz? Google Search runs two big blocks of ads, full width, set off by a thin border, one above and one below the results. If Atomz has less obtrusive ads I'd be tempted to go back.
Google DOES let you put up a logo at the top of the page of search results, so it looks like it goes with your site to some extent--are you referring to being able to tweak how the results were displayed? I liked that feature too.
Maybe I've talked myself into going back to Atomz.
How obtrusive are the ads on Atomz? Google Search runs two big blocks of ads, full width, set off by a thin border, one above and one below the results. If Atomz has less obtrusive ads I'd be tempted to go back.
I would say that the ad blocks are very similar in either Atomz or Google site search. Again, both full width and both thin border.
Google DOES let you put up a logo at the top of the page of search results, so it looks like it goes with your site to some extent--are you referring to being able to tweak how the results were displayed? I liked that feature too.
I understand that Google lets you place a logo, but Atomz gives (as far as I know) greater control over the style of your results, and allows me to blend the results far better into my page layout. Having said that, I have not tried Google, only seen this on other sites so can't be 100% on this.
If you want to see an example, PM me and I'll let you know address and search terms.
Graham
results pages can end up dominated by the Google ads.
Actually I went back to the old free Google Search as the AdSense one was so cluttered with ads before and after that a person could hardly find the results. The old Google free search that has been around forever looks pretty much like a regular Google results page.
I wasn't making enough money to matter anyway. So if you just want a decent looking free search the old basic Google search is one way to go.