Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

What Is Usual Reporting Time Delay When Adding New Website URL Channel

Channel added but doesn't show up in list of active channels

         

Webwork

6:46 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Kelsey (my daughter) and I just rolled out an early version of a site/domain that gets a healthy bit of type-in traffic from around the globe. I added my Adsense code and was able to see that relevant ads were being served from the get-go.

It's been ~4 days and, despite adding a URL channel for the domain/site a) the site doesn't appear in my list of active URL channels (yet it's in the list of authorized sites); and, b) no visits/page loads have been reported/recorded since that time . . but ads continue to appear.

AWStats shows a healthy number of unique visits. They're not all bots, I'm sure. ;) (It's a nifty domain.)

What are the "usual delays", after Adsense integration, in recording/reporting visits/clicks and/or a site - added to the list of URL channels - showing up in the "active channel" window?

When should one "be concerned"? Is some delay just a matter of course?

I sometimes wonder if sites that start off with type-in traffic, before serious/significant indexing . . which type-ins come with most all of my domains . . I wonder if natural type-in traffic sites are subject, early on, to extra/early scrutiny.

If such is the case I feel like saying "Hey, Google, some sites/domains REALLY DO get visits before they get search engine love . . "

"But I understand, dear . . . not everyone who brings you flowe . . err . . type-in visitors . . is of good intentions . . and you're a bit hesitant because you've been burned in the past . . so you go ahead and satisfy any doubts that my aim . . err . . visitors are true . . " :P)

Everybody sing: "Allll-i-son . . [youtube.com...] . . my aim is truuuu . . "

netmeg

7:30 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That seems pretty odd. I added two new sites about two months ago, and saw impressions within an hour after launch.

Webwork

7:40 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Argh . . Odd seldom is a bother . . except sometimes . . like when it's an odd noise . . and then the engine seizes . . :-/

'twasn't the response I was hoping for, Meg.

Worse, Google seldom explains its own oddness, oddities, oddarn treatment . . Although my "hunch" about new sites / newly indexed sites, especially those without inbound links that get traffic from type-ins, is that they may sometimes be subject to "scrutiny before reporting" . .

Hello? ASA? Is my hunch a bunch of . . bananas?

Atomic

9:16 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



they may sometimes be subject to "scrutiny before reporting" . .

There's an interesting thought. Could the domain name itself beg for scrutiny?

Webwork

9:18 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Adsense site diagnostics is now showing a page/URL that is blocked - which page never existed on the site. Thankfully, the base URL isn't showing as blocked.

Maybe this new . . err . . negative development . . is a hopeful sign? :-/ At least there's an indication that Gadsense knows I'm there . . or is it "not there" . . ?

I'm so confused.

Webwork

9:22 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Could the domain name itself beg for scrutiny?


I certainly hope not, since it's about as friendly-nice-green a domain as a domain can get . . as in forest green . . not newly minted green. ;) I've held it for awhile and the worst I've done with it was park it and let Google feed it ads . .

netmeg

10:39 pm on Jul 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Were you parking it with AFD or some other company with a Google feed? Cause I noticed that AFD is kind of ... shall we say, understaffed. I had no ends of problems with it - and the last interaction was when they sent me approvals for a boatload of domains I'd taken out months before because I got tired of waiting for approvals.

If you did have them in AFD, they might not have them out of that system yet.

Just spitballin'

ken_b

1:55 am on Jul 20, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Do you by any chance use the "approved sites" function? If so, did you add te new site to the list?

Webwork

2:18 am on Jul 20, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yes and yes, ken_b, and thanks for asking "just in case" (I'm human).

Just added it as a "custom channel", too, and made it targetable.

"Come out, come out wherever you are . . little site." :)

And, Dear Lord, let there not be blocking or blackbox penalty/barring issues. I have done no wrong, so wrong me not. Amen.

netmeg

4:14 pm on Jul 20, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I don't think you've got a penalty, otherwise ads wouldn't be showing at all (or there would be PSAs)

DaStarBuG

4:10 am on Jul 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just launched a new domain 3 days ago and started serving AdSense yesterday. On target Ads, all custom channels reporting correctly, and revenue is accumulating

Webwork

3:00 pm on Jul 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Okay. Now this gets interesting.

According to AWStates the top "Host", by far, that is "visiting" my site and pulling 100s of pages and consuming Megs of bandwidth is an IP address connected with RR.com.

When I do an IP lookup and attempt to visit that IP address Norton spawns a danger message (I removed the full IP address to protect the unwary):


Malicious Web Site Blocked
You attempted to access:
[cpe-174-108-***-***.carolina.res.rr.com...]
This is a known malicious web site. It is recommended that you do NOT visit this site. The detailed report explains the security risks on this site.


I wish I knew the important or relevance of this factoid, i.e., whether it represents an effort to hack/pawn my site or whether the site already has been compromised in some way. I'm not seeing anything. I've looked at the database tables for anything that might stand out and didn't find a thing. Argh. I am a perennial noob. :-/

netmeg

4:08 pm on Jul 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



At this point, I would probably tot over to the AdSense Help forum and ask some questions over there because there are real Google people participating.