Forum Moderators: martinibuster
[edited by: CMidd at 3:21 pm (utc) on Mar 19, 2011]
[edited by: netmeg at 3:22 pm (utc) on Mar 19, 2011]
Large impression based advertiser who spend million get top priority over your ad space "even when they are not the highest bidder". I tested this my self as an Adword advertiser / publisher targeting my own site.
My normal pay per click is $.45, so i targeted my own site at $1.00 and was beat for top spots by larger advertisers. I click on top advertiser and was paid $.15 cents. I found my ad "by clicking right arrow and browser to my ad on page 3" clicked my ad and was paid $.68 cents, and was charged $1.00 by Google.
Also, Groupon is NOT just CPM, because I see them on some of my sites that report virtually no CPM ads.
The *last* thing Google would want to do is rig the auction system in such a blatant fashion as you outline; there are enough trust issues as it is. That sort of thing would completely demolish it, and Google is in it for the long haul, not the short money grab.
Why does Google let Groupon.com spam almost every site with Adsense? It's far worse than eBay's spam ever was. I kicked Groupon off my sites with the blocker, like other publishers here, but almost every site I visit now with Adsense has a Groupon ad. It is 100% irrelevant to the page content and it's usually the top-placed ad. The text is always the same. The irony is Google allegedly tried to buy Groupon recently. But why has Google become a sell-out and compromised its core principle of contextual relevance?
You have read the Adsense TOS, yes ?
It is enough to get you banned. As you are aware of that...
At least WebmasterWorld will be relieved there will be one less "I didn't know you could click on my own adverts" kind of thread.
it's not rigging the auction. it's preference. Take a look at Ezinearticles.com They can do thing other adsense publishers can't.
I hate 'em too - I get followed around everywhere by a giant glazed donut from Living Social (same idea as Groupon) and I don't like 'em on my sites, but my revenue has never been higher over all, so I gotta think they're making money for the publishers
why doesn't Adsense consider rotating the ads
say every 5 minutes
[edited by: Leosghost at 12:26 am (utc) on Mar 20, 2011]
Because it would burn CPU cycles on the machine that was displaying the page
and if the page had its own images/ photos that would hold anyones interest for 5 minutes?
[edited by: nick28 at 12:36 am (utc) on Mar 20, 2011]
OK, at least G could set an option in Adsense interface
and if the page had its own images/ photos that would hold anyones interest for 5 minutes?
Consider entertainment site with movies, shows, TVs ...!and find it highly unlikely that anyone with that kind of content would want distracting "all singing all dancing ads" along side / over / under their content.
Doesn't load the pages, hidden behind the arrows of Text ads all before?
I mean yes , and it is the same as rotating.
and find it highly unlikely that anyone with that kind of content would want distracting "all singing all dancing ads" along side / over / under their content.
I click on the ad from my girl friends' smart phone "Droid" that supported Adsense, so it was impossible for Google to track it back to me "i also purchase from Macys all the time LMAO"
Well go watch most TV channels then and pay attention to the bottom of your screen.
Yes, everyone knows there are premium publishers who have different TOS. And presumably, premium advertisers. What of it? That doesn't mean that they still don't have to compete for a publisher's advertising space, or that they're not the highest paying available ad for that spot at that exact moment. I'm reasonably sure that these ads are high paying, because my revenues starting going way up when they started appearing (and my demographic fits pretty closely to whom they are marketing)
As for clicking on my own ads - nope, never intentionally. And I most certainly don't bid in AdWords on my own keywords. I don't need to.
Next week it will be belly fat adverts.