Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Out of curiosity, is mediabot picking up on the alt text?
I'm not sure what "mediabot" is, but from my experiences, if Google Ad can't find any advertisers for your keywords, they default to your URL address. Which is why I've recently (as in, this morning) change the name of the directory the gallery is in. This way, it picks up more of the "movie" keyword, and displays relevant ads. In case it doesn't read my alt text, I use the same string of words for the alt text and underneath the picture via caption. I think it works.
I've yet to weigh the benefit of changing the way I display the images to be able to add the banners again. Sounds like it might well be a good idea though.
Shortz
For instance an image of a blue widget brings up ads for blue widgets, and not ads for other stock photo galleries. However Image galleries in general have v poor ctr's so I don't make much money on this site.
Maybe I should set up a SEO stock photo site with images of people busily writing meta tags.
For instance an image of a blue widget brings up ads for blue widgets, and not ads for other stock photo galleries. However Image galleries in general have v poor ctr's so I don't make much money on this site.
I wonder what TEXT info you have on the widget image which is not on the others. I am trying to see if Adsense is able to pick up Image File Names as content, or URL only, or require at least some TEXT words in HTML body.
I know there is a default adsense for most sites, but once Adsense found there is not much TEXT, they will show PSA from the next update (10-20 minutes from the first crawl.)
I have ideas that will make CTR at high level between 10% and 20%, but the problem is the CPC. I can not think of a high paying CPC which I can build images around. 0.1 a click is nothing much after Adwords, SEO, hosting, domain etc.
In the discussion on galleries not having text it seems to me a line of text for every picture in a gallery would be quite a bit of text. It seems that Google thinks so as well.
shortfork, one reason to avoid using pop ups to show the larger versions of you images is that a lot of people have pop up blockers now. It's a frustrating case where a legitimate use of pop ups is affected by the pop up ads.
Do the popup blockers stop "voluntary" javascript windows? as in javascript:openWindow calls?
If so, that truly does suck. Outside the fact that I could maybe get more clicks by changing all my code for images, it sure looks better to have the smaller window open with the larger image and caption forced to be on top of the page that you clicked on. Way less confusing if the images are illistrating a story and not specifically a "gallery"..
But then, I guess I should be more concerned with my income level, which has been almost zip from '97 until last april when I discovered AdSense, which has been a real windfall.. hummn.. decisions decisions, art, money, art, money..........
;-)
Shortz