Forum Moderators: martinibuster
So the same page would include adsense ads from me in one spot and from the preferred member in another spot. This seems to be the most fair way to do revenue sharing as members would truly get paid what they earn.
Is this allowed by Google Adsense? I don't see why it wouldn't be but better safe than sorry.
[code.google.com...]
If Google is ok with API revenue sharing I guess they would be ok with my workaround method. Anyone know for sure or how I can find out?
Is this allowed by Google Adsense? I don't see why it wouldn't be but better safe than sorry.
I think it's a bad idea, regardless of whether Google would allow it. You're creating a situation where one or more of your "members" are going to do something to get you kicked out of AdSense. The only question is how soon will it happen.
FarmBoy
At two different "meet the engineers" events, I spoke with AdSense engineers and asked them if it was ok for me to allow my users to put their ads on my site. Each time I received the same response. They said I could do it as long as my users entered the complete ad code (not just the pub id) and that there was never ads from two difference adwords accounts displayed on the same page at the same time. One Googler even offered the names of a few sites that were allowing revenue share in this manner.
When I pressed them on the fact that the AdSense TOS requires that the AdSense account holder owns the web site on which the ads are displayed, they said that I should contact my AdSense rep to get an official response. I did, and my rep said the same thing that the Googler's told me.
Even still, I have a hard time building a business model which breaks the official TOS of the company which provides the majority of my ad revenue, so I have not yet tried it.
Hope this helps.
* Adsense TOS states adsense can only be placed on pages owned by the adsense publisher.
* People inside Google say it is ok to have adsense on a site you don't own as long as only one publishers ads are displayed on a page at the same time.
- Instead of of my plan on giving preferred members 1 out of 3 blocks per page I would need to give them only their ads on one out of three page views.
* Some sites are already doing this like d******point ?
* Even though Google allows it, it is a risk because it is not allowed in Adsense TOS.
- I think it is all about revenue, and if this increases Google revenue without scamming the advertisers then Google will look the other way.
Anyone else have any experience with revenue sharing via Google AdSense? I am surprised this is such a murky area.
Sharing your ad spaceA number of publishers have asked us if it's acceptable to place multiple publishers' ad code on the same page or site. Often they'll run into this issue when two AdSense publishers manage a site together and both want to display their ads, or if a site owner hosts content and ads from other publishers on the same page as their own.
The answer is that yes, we do allow this.
I've heard the doom and gloom predictions about having your account pulled if some other publisher violates the TOS, but no one ever seems to come up with an example of this actually happening.
[adsense.blogspot.com...]
Now that I verified it is allowable to share google adsense blocks with members on the same page I can move forward with the implementation of brainstorm.
I'll PM you when I have some results to share.
i understand how you can expect to get more traffic -- because more people will be tempted to stick around your site because there will now be something in it for them (their own ads). but surely that is only going to tempt one person at a time -- the people who actually sign up. it's not going to tempt anyone else.
all this extra traffic that you are going to get are just the people who sign up -- and they are the exact same people who will not be allowed to click the ads. (and not just their own ads... now they won't be able to click ANY of the ads on your site, just in case it happens to be theirs)
if you're just doing it as a reward thing, then that's fair enough. but seeing as you don't get much else out of it and you might even land yourself with some fake clicking problems, then it hardly seems worth it to me.
all this extra traffic that you are going to get are just the people who sign up -- and they are the exact same people who will not be allowed to click the ads.
I get about 500 times more random visitors (50,000%) than I do members in a given day. If half of the impressions go to my members, I'm still doing well. Very well.
Do you get premium ads or permium advertisers if you are eligible for [code.google.com...] ?