Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Is there a new or improved feature you would like to see in AdSense? Let us know here.
ASA
I'd be interested in reading those testimonials to see if there are any trends in what types of requests are honored.
Well, I think you might have missed Hobbs' fine humour between his lines.
The "many others" part in his statement made me laugh, actually, because it can't be many publishers who saw their wishes implemented, given the loooooong lists of suggestions we made over the years, often requesting the same basic improvements over and over again. ;-)
Hobbs, please correct me if I'm wrong.
(See May's wish list for links to all previous threads)
I'd rather this thread remains a wish list Farmboy, but to give you the bottom line, most fulfilled features have been rather cosmetic and for convenience, nothing earth shattering (apart from cracking down on some MFA but I doubt that was fulfilled due to requests), as for the relentlessly repeated requests like blocking by account and larger filter, we might as well give up on those and save our breath and bandwidth, they're most certainly not going to happen and we have neither leverage nor pull to change that.
Sorry Zett, it was not meant that way, but
I stand corrected. Sorry for mis-interpreting you.
Well, at least I got a somewhat cool message number: #3666666
;-)
I'd rather this thread remains a wish list Farmboy....
I don't think you have to worry about the thread being taken over by a list of fulfilled requests. It's that whole blood from a turnip thing.
FarmBoy
I'd be interested in reading those testimonials to see if there are any trends in what types of requests are honored.
I can't be totally certain that suggestions I've made have been implemented by Google, but I do remember a thread where I observed a way Google could implement the Ad Review process.
My idea was that Google would allow publishers to send "canned" responses to site-targeting advertisers, informing them as to why their sites were blocked.
You can read the thread here:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google_adsense/3586563.htm [webmasterworld.com]
Of course -- Google may have already had this idea in place, but we will probably never know.
Add this: a single, clear, to the point privacy policy for adsense (and one for analytics while at it). Let us link to yours instead of twisting our hand into telling our visitor what they will get from you,not from us.
-FredW
Hi. I'm a Mac. And I'm a PC. And I'm a PC too.
Add this: a single, clear, to the point privacy policy for adsense (and one for analytics while at it). Let us link to yours instead of twisting our hand into telling our visitor what they will get from you,not from us.
This is already being handled by the Privacy groups in California because it is violating Californian law.
The search engine giant is being asked to write the word "privacy" alongside other information links.
"It's a short, seven-letter word and in the world of privacy it's a very important word," said Beth Givens of Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
Google says its policy is easy to find and it gives "accessible information".
Of all .hk sites McAfee tested, it flagged 19.2% as dangerous or potentially dangerous to visitors; it flagged 11.8% of .cn sites and 11.7% of .info sites that way.
Armed with that info, wouldn't you think google would take a closer look at these type of domains, and also keep tabs on them.
I don't want to send my visitors to a dangerous site. I blocked one the other day that sitemeter didn't like.
We shouldn't be doing this, google should.
--earnings-impressions-clicks-Conversions-eCPM-CTR-EPC
content
-----------------------------------------------------------
referrals
-----------------------------------------------------------
search
-----------------------------------------------------------
adjustments
-----------------------------------------------------------
Earnings Grand Total
all in a text or html table
(and no I don't want to learn how to set something similar up with the current advanced report settings and MS Excel tricks, it won't work as neat or as simple as outlined above)
This will heavily reduce the load on Google server resources all month long but specially by the end and beginning of every new month, cut down on your electric bill and even save the polar bears, baby seals and the rain forest..
[edited by: Hobbs at 9:01 am (utc) on June 7, 2008]
I have 6 reports set to be sent once a day. Some days I get 3, some days 6, some days 4, some days.... well the number of reports actually sent is always a surprise.
It would also be nice if they were all sent as one big group each day, as it is now, some days they arrive in one group, some days 2 groups, etc.
In general, it would be nice if AdSense got one feature working the way it was intended before they released the next new feature.
Do you think that if enough of us say that enough times on enough "what would you like to see..." threads, it will ever happen?
I'm haunted by a Flash ad, which will not show up in the Preview Tool. Also, right-clicking on the ad will just result in the flash contextual menu, but not in the display of the URL that will be used when clicked.
I do not see how I can block this ad without clicking on the ads by myself (which I *won't* do). Of course, I could start guessing the target URL by what is mentioned in the ad, but if these guys use a tracking domain, it probably won't be filtered.
Righclick within the ad iframe and view source
Right-clicking within ad iframe gives me the FLASH right-click menu, e.g. "enlarge", "show all", "quality", but NO "view source". Am I missing something?
Try at the edges of the ad.
First, this does not work. I seem not be the only one plagued by Flash ads:
[webmasterworld.com...]
The tip mentioned in the post, by the way, does not work, because the target URL is scrambled, just /pagead/imgad?id= followed by a 35 character string.
Second, to keep the thread on topic, I requested this feature ("Provide a way to identify landing URLs of Flash ads") because it seems to be a serious problem. I think it to be unconvenient (at least) to have to right-click the ad somewhere close to it's edges and then hope to be able to identify the advertiser.
The only way to stop this nonsense is by turning off image ads, which I am seriously considering now.
annej mentions that she does not want AdSense to be related to the Google account she uses for other services.
Please note that you can choose to update your AdSense login to a new Google account in order to keep your AdSense account separate from your existing Google account. When you follow the steps in the wizard, you'll see the option to create a new login and password just for your AdSense account.
Finally, please note that all publishers will soon be required to update their AdSense logins to Google Accounts.
While he might be a bit too outspoken, the inability to properly block crappy ads/advertisers is something we all fight with. If it is allowed to continue his solution might become our solution as well.
[webmasterworld.com...]
Despite having opted out we are still seeing CPM impressions. Why?
Please note that you can choose to update your AdSense login to a new Google account in order to keep your AdSense account separate from your existing Google account. When you follow the steps in the wizard, you'll see the option to create a new login and password just for your AdSense account.Finally, please note that all publishers will soon be required to update their AdSense logins to Google Accounts.
AdSense Advisor.
My log in for Google AdSense and Google AdSense ARE the same and have been for a very, very long time.
When I follow the wizard that asks if I am indeed me@mydomain.com I click yes that is me, it then takes me to log in again and when I do I get the same wizard.
If you read the posts in this thread there are others with exactly the same problem as well.
That means go out and look at ads in our niche, click , and wait to for them to appear.
A service where some of the people that are banned get told reasons like: You were banned because you're annoying/not very smart, you were banned because you are short sighted/lack common sense/greedy, you were banned because simply we don't like you ..
Now that should free up support time and can be considered clear & meaningful communication.
Starting with 2004 on top, is really not all that helpful for me.
Thanks!
