Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Has anyone created a site around a high-paying keyword?

Did it work?

         

asp4bunnies

10:22 pm on Sep 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I own one site that does extremely well traffic-wise, gets a lot of frequent press and has a very high pagerank, however it's keyword niche isn't a very high paying one. It does well in Adsense only by virtue of sheer volume.

What I was wondering is, if I create another website around a niche with high paying keywords and feed it traffic and pagerank via links from my high volume site, would it then do well?

Obviously the link traffic wouldn't be ideally targetted and I'm sure CTR would be low at first, until it starts getting picked up by search engines....but is turning one major lowpaying site into a feeder site to dish out traffic to minor highpaying sites a good strategy? Does anyone have any experience with this?

ken_b

10:33 pm on Sep 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'm confused. Is this the same "high pay" site you mentioned here [webmasterworld.com] a few days ago?

If so might you be able to get an idea of how well this strategy works from that? Or did you not link that site from the high volumn site yet?

Or are you building yet another "high pay" site?

ChrisKud5

10:47 pm on Sep 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Making a site for the purpose of showing adsense ads is against the TOS.

Making a site to show high paying ads would fall under that. I would certainly not be making noise about it on a public forum where google employees frequent.

That other thread said you made the site already, and now you are wondering if you should make the site? High paying keywords are high paying because they are in demand. You will NOT get ranked well in Google for any terms associated with a high paying keyword unless you have a plethora of high PR inbounds and some real real good luck. That is why certain ads cost a lot, people want to be seen and they are willing to pay a few bucks a click to be seen.

Do not expect to be getting much traffic from search engines for a new site that is in a very competitive keyword market.

hyperkik

11:13 pm on Sep 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The model for making a "made for AdSense" site that generates both search engine traffic and revenues has been described in this forum, with at least one member suggesting that he earns "FedEx Club" money that way. So Google doesn't seem to be excessively concerned about such confessions made in this forum.

Is This Real - [webmasterworld.com...]

"Made for AdSense" sites - [webmasterworld.com...]

asp4bunnies

11:38 pm on Sep 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ken_b,

That site is now displaying ads and I haven't linked it yet.

EDIT: This isn't a violation of ToS anymore than creating a new site knowing you're going to put adsense ads on it is a violation.

This is a legitimate and totally separate site, that I know in advance will carry adsense ads. If you followed Google's ToS verbatim on that issue, any website that was developed after AdSense's program came out would be suspect. I'm pretty sure they are gearing that clause towards pages that are completely irrelevant to the website as a whole and deliberately have high paying keywords: i.e. adding a mortgages page to a website dedicated to adult swim cartoons.

blairsp

11:43 am on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



why don't you just try it and add it to one of the other 2,750,000 sites on mesothelioma(I am sure that is what you are meaning). Perhaps you will be lucky enough to get into the top 100 pages of search results. Then G will kick your main site out of the programme because it decided that site two was made for adsense.

Bear in mind that on this forum (and life in general)one person will make nothing out of something and another will be in the fed ex club . Similar to one post will say "my ctr just dropped" whereas the next person will say mines went up by 10 million percent.

The only way you will know if your site is going to be succesful is to try it. As long as you are aware of the potential pitfalls (one of which outlined above) then you have nothing to complain about

asp4bunnies

12:41 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As mentioned before - serps isn't an issue here because I'm not relying on it for traffic. So the fact that 2 million other sites exist is not really relevant to my strategy (it would help in the long run, but just isn't a factor to my question).

Aside from that, I seem to get the impression from you that niche sites that are about high paying keywords are not allowed to be set up at all, regardless of their actual quality?

That can't be right.

Made for adsense pages with no real content are not allowed. Real sites, with real information are.

gopi

1:42 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



asp4bunnies , i dont think Google have a problem with this ...Go for it if you confident that you can generate relevent traffic for the high paying competitive niche you choosed

blairsp

3:17 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Aside from that, I seem to get the impression from you that niche sites that are about high paying keywords are not allowed to be set up at all, regardless of their actual quality?

Not at all. If you have the expertise & knowledge to editorially set up the site and maintain it then it would be an interesting experiment and I wish you luck. However, all I am saying is that if I (personally) was looking for information on Mesothelioma I would check out the British Medical association website, cancer research UK etc (read into that your own national government or official body website)before looking at anyone elses. In fact I am not sure I would even bother to look at anyone elses website. Of course I may be alone in that(otherwise why is there 2, 275,000 websites already on that topic).

All I know is that I am not a health professional so I wouldn't set up a website for that topic.

If I were to do it though, one thing I would do is get a clear disclaimer on your website. Bear in mind that there are some societies (e.g. some states of America) who are particularly litigious and any google earnings may be swallowed up by someone suing you.

ChrisKud5

5:46 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As mentioned before - serps isn't an issue here because I'm not relying on it for traffic. So the fact that 2 million other sites exist is not really relevant to my strategy (it would help in the long run, but just isn't a factor to my question).

If this other "high traffic site" you have will be passing on visitors, expect your CTR to be down around .01%.

SERP traffic will get you a higher CTR, as the people are actually looking for that type of info. Site X about trees going to site Y about erectile issues is not going to woo your visitors into looking any deeper and clicking an ad about the topic.

Maybe Google will slap a penalty on your other site for cross linking or some sort of strange linking behavior and then you will have a whole host of problems. Who knows how google calculates these types of links, but site X with one topic having a link to site Y with another totally different site could stir the googlemaster.

PR 0 is not fun if you have been spending years building a good traffic base.

The internet does not need another Morgtage, Casino, or Drug site, I think they pretty well have it covered right now.

Just be careful whatever you do and do not jepordize your existing site, it is not worth it.

The_Ralph

6:23 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Making a site for the purpose of showing adsense ads is against the TOS.

Yeah, right. ALL mesothelioma AdSense sites were created for the purpose of showing AdSense.

Although I very much doubt that mesothelioma is one of the highest paying keywords. It's one of the most expensive PPC keywords, yes, but all of the leading AdWords advertisers for mesothelioma have opted out of content match. I doubt anyone is paying over $1/click for that word on content sites.

blairsp

8:18 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In the interests of research I have just came across a Meso site which has a broad banner at the top, one sentence of pointless information, then three lines of google ads (one after the other with only a line break of code between them) I wonder how much this guys fed ex is worth every month!. Strange thing is he is an adwords advertiser.

Click on the "about us" tag and you get taken to his links page one of which is for cialis-I will (seriously) really need to find out what that is. I keep getting spam about it.

Anyone know the addy for adsense "complaints" as I am pretty sure that is a made for adsense site.

asp4bunnies

8:27 pm on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The_Ralph, that could very well be true. I'll definitely keep an eye on that channel and see exactly how it does. If it's not worth it, I'd simply drop off interest in it. My only expense with it was to pay a copy writer to research the topic and create original content for it, so it wouldn't be a huge loss (just dissapointing).

ChrisKud, I think that Google only penalizes PR for cloaked sites that crosslink to each other (meaning they carry the same exact content verbatim and only exist to boost PR). Crosslinking several legitimate sites with different content is not a problem, regardless of their relation to each other from what I understand.

Teshka

5:24 am on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What I was wondering is, if I create another website around a niche with high paying keywords and feed it traffic and pagerank via links from my high volume site, would it then do well?

Most of my sites have started this way. I always throw a link to a new site from one of my existing high PR sites, then once the new site has recieved PR, I do a link building campaign. It's just easier to get links when you can offer PR 4/5 links in return.

Generally, I remove the original link once the new site has enough incoming links to maintain its PR.

asp4bunnies

5:35 pm on Sep 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just an fyi (without saying which keyword it was) though you can probably guess - I just got my channel results back and the value on day one of this experiment was lower than $.04 a click.

I thought it would be lower than the million dollars everyone thinks that keyword brings in, but < $0.04 is extremely unexpected.