Forum Moderators: martinibuster
First, the smaller items, summarized from a blog focused on contextual advertising.
Referral Products
You could have four products before, with one button or call to action for each. With the changes yesterday, you can now have buttons each, and there's no longer a limit to four.
Also, Google is no longer allowing publishers to require referrals to be used as a requirement for anything that your site offers. (Ex: Download Picasa through us to receive 10 free stock images from our archives.)
More on Images and AdSense
As a result of the last changes, they've also clarified on some of the gray areas like the use of images next to ads. You cannot use anything to force viewer's eyeballs towards the ads like arrows or graphics indicating motion.
An example of this is something I've already had to change for a client. They run a pet supplies site and had AdSense displayed in a colored table with a background graphic to match. While it had borders, etc. to separate it from the page, it had an image of a young puppy glancing up towards the ad unit. It worked great... but is no longer allowed.
AdSense for Search: SERPS
You can now have one and only one ad unit on your AdSense for search result pages. Previously, you could not use any.
There were a few others, like not using AdSense on sites that have student papers available, etc. -- but those are all pretty clear now.
The most disturbing change though is again, one that has me all worked up. It's regarding the competitive ads and services, and has a number of issues associated with it.
First, we're not allowed to have AdSense units designed in such a way that it mimics anything else on our site.
Second, we're no longer allowed to use other programs (like YPN) on the same domains as AdSense. Let me make that clear -- they're not saying we can't use them on the same page... They're saying that we cannot use them on the same SITE. It's rediculous -- and kills any oportunity that we as publishers have for testing our content for maximum monetization.
Finally, Google is really just expecting publishers to accept this and move on -- and I think it's ludicrious. The simple fact that they're no longer allowing any part of our sites (table colors, sizes, etc.) match any Google ad units is horrible.
I understand that the immediate counter to this is -- hey, they're still paying you -- you should do what they want to keep the check coming in. I get that part, but as site owners we should be able to design our sites and monetize our content as we would like to. We own our domains, Google doesn't.
First, we're not allowed to have AdSense units designed in such a way that it mimics anything else on our site.
Finally, Google is really just expecting publishers to accept this and move on -- and I think it's ludicrious. The simple fact that they're no longer allowing any part of our sites (table colors, sizes, etc.) match any Google ad units is horrible.
Could you pull up the exact wording for this, please? I would be very interested to discuss this here in the forum.
I can understand why they would like to see such behaviour, but in practice it may be a bit difficult to follow this rule.
Could you pull up the exact wording for this, please? I would be very interested to discuss this here in the forum.I can understand why they would like to see such behaviour, but in practice it may be a bit difficult to follow this rule.
Here's the new text...
Competitive Ads and Services
In order to prevent user confusion, we do not permit Google ads or search boxes to be published on websites that also contain other ads or services formatted to use the same layout and colors as the Google ads or search boxes on that site. Although you may sell ads directly on your site, it is your responsibility to ensure these ads cannot be confused with Google ads.
Please note, my assumption on running ads on the same domains is based on others' coverage of the policy. If it's off-base, I'll have a lot of back-peddling to do... quickly.
Please note, my assumption on running ads on the same domains is based on others' coverage of the policy. If it's off-base, I'll have a lot of back-peddling to do... quickly.
I think you need to back-peddle, but we'll have to await clarification. The issue is whether those ads can be confused with adsense. For example, yahoo ads are clearly marked, and formated differently, so it's hard to imagine google would be concerned about confusion.
One thing I'm wondering. I took a quick look at the new TOS, and I might have missed something, but I didn't see anything that would even forbid competing ads on the same page, which was the case before. Where's the clause(s) about other contextual ads?
Like I said, I only had a quick look.
AdSense publishers are required to adhere to the webmaster quality guidelines posted at [google.com...]Especially as many of those webmaster guidelines are a bit silly. And, Google can change those guidelines without even informing Adsense webmasters that they've changed.
Rather going through the hazzle of redesigning the site, I'll just replace G with anyone in a competitive advantageous situation to this new and stronger rule.
It's the market, it's competition. I will the hell chose what works best and Google is allowed to make mistakes in this competitive world. Even ones that will cost them publishers to jump ship.
Beautiful business that is, it's like democracy again!
Competitive Ads and Services
In order to prevent user confusion, we do not permit Google ads or search boxes to be published on websites that also contain other ads or services formatted to use the same layout and colors as the Google ads or search boxes on that site. Although you may sell ads directly on your site, it is your responsibility to ensure these ads cannot be confused with Google ads.
This does not mean that you cannot run other ad services (YPN, CJ, Linkshare, AdBrite, etc.) on your website. It simply means that those other ads cannot mimic or look like Adsense ads.
For example, many affiliate advertisers create banners (i.e. 468x60, 120x240, etc.) that look like contextual ads. These wouldn't be allowed on the same page as Google ads.
Also, placing Adbrite or YPN contextual ads on the same page as Google Adsense ads, is against the Adsense TOS.
For example: They state that you cannot display Adsense adverts on pages with "mature content". What is mature content? Content aimed at mature adults?
Does this mean holidays for the over 50's are a no-no? (Sorry Saga).
Or how about Charles Dickens. His books are (generally) not suitable for children, and could be classed as having mature content, would they be considered inappropriate?
Loose definitions worry me, they provide a mechanism whereby an agency, if it so wished, could withhold payment due on the grounds that the publisher had "broken the terms of the agreement".
Matt
Note the phrase "formatted to use the same layout and colors as the Google ads or search boxes on that site".To me this says that you can actually run YPN and AdSense on the same page now, as long as they are formatted distinctly. If not, I cannot find where it says that.
That was my take on it also. If that's the case, it would be a HUGE change in policy, and one that would probably be welcomed by virtually all adsense publishers.
It's weird. The non-compete part has been there for years. It's hard to believe they would remove it and replace it with "same layout and colors" without a little more fanfare and more explicit announcement from google.
Then again, their market dominance is so good, and their competition so ineffective that I have wondered if they would relax the non-compete stuff.
Right now it's a wait and see, and hope for official public comment from G.
Can anyone honestly say they where not a bit worried and that they do not at all feel pushed around?
Yep. I don't see anything unusual or heinous in the TOS; if anything there are positive changes. I'm not worried in the least, and hope to make even more money on referrals, which have always done pretty well for me.
Actually my interpretation is wrong, as there is still a line in the Terms & Conditions about it.
Thanks, Jomax. I figure it had to be there somewhere, but my tired old eyes didn't pick it out.
Is it on the same page as the revised TOS linked to in the first message in this thread?
(I'm asking because it's not uncommon for changes to result is some temporarily out of date pages on google).
Note the phrase "formatted to use the same layout and colors as the Google ads or search boxes on that site".To me this says that you can actually run YPN and AdSense on the same page now, as long as they are formatted distinctly. If not, I cannot find where it says that.
Exactly, jomaxx. My earlier reference to placing YPN and Google Adsense on the same page was in reference to both ad types being identical (which is a no-no).
But if both ad types (i.e. colors, design, etc.) are formatted different, it appears that Google is now allowing it.
If anything, I'm happy that the new policies do allow publishers to employ other contextual ads on same pages as Google ads.
Cheers.
[edited by: jatar_k at 9:52 pm (utc) on Jan. 18, 2007]
[edit reason] no urls thanks [/edit]