Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I did some research into what kind of ads perform better, and generally just wanted to overhaul my site, so I did, with good results. Wereas I was getting Z clicks per day before, now I am getting (Z * 1.5) clicks. Yeeha, right? Wrong.
After overhauling the site, I am now getting (Y * 4) pageviews instead of only Y page views (it makes navigation better). This, of course, led to a lower CTR, since I had more pageviews (same number of visitors, though). Now my EPC has dropped from X to 2/3rds X. I am still earning more than I was before, which is nice, but why did the EPC go down?
Does CTR effect EPC? If so, why? Shouldn't ROI be what influnces EPC, not CTR?
Several times over these last few weeks it has crossed my mind that AdSense was rewarding my site with better ads because of the increased CTR.
Of course the other explanation, and probably the right one, is that the holidays are over. Advertisers are spending money again.
The added money is great but it just so happens that the extra income boosts me over a certain psychological level on a regular basis, thus making me a very happy person.
I'd say about 4 out of 10 adwords users use the conversion function .. more than enough to get reasonable data.
And trust me, if you had that data, and you had publisher a) conversion rate equal to that of regular AdWords and publisher b) who had a conversion rate that was a quarter of what AdWords could produce .. who would you send the high priced Ads to?
The Googleguys aint dumb, my friend.
They use this to determine fraud as well, btw. If you are sending loads of traffic that isn't converting this is how they figure out whether or not you should stay in the program.
The problem is that this idea has quickly gone from a what-if scenario to a theory to a belief to a "fact". It's not a fact, and in the absence of any real evidence I think it belongs back in the what-if department.
Just adding our 2 cents to the ongoing guessing game called google adsense:)
It is just aggregated by campaign and all you can see is aggregated CPC. Do we increase or decrease based on the conversion? Absolutely. That's why we pull the plug on content ads... I guess the reporting was not correct or the quality of traffic was just horible. The conversion rate was 1/10 of search traffic's. At the same CPC why would you spend the money on content ads if you know they don't drive qulity traffic?
Here is another thought.
I have a few web sites as a hobby and run adsense on them. I HOPE I am sending qulity traffic to the advertisers. If they notice any low qulity traffic, they will turn it off as I did for our company. The EPC then will go down because major advertisers dropped out.
Well, if we get more money next year, we may turn it on again but for now the search traffic seems enough for us.
But why would google punish all AdSense advertisers across the board because just a few are sending non converting traffic?
While it's not 100% complete, AdWords advertisers do use Googles conversion tool, at least enough that Google can get a sophisticated statistical (generated over a group of advertisers over time, not just one or two) sampling of the quality of traffic clicking through.
They then calibrate the results against what their own Google SERP 'AdSense campaign' does in terms of conversions and use that as a barometer of whether or not to throttle / kick out low quality websites.
Just participate in an AdWords campaign and you will see how naturally Google leverages statistical sampling all the time.