Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I would guess that if charity ad clicks are reported that this would explain it but this is a small site and as far as I can tell there are no charity ads.
Can anyone offer a reason for why this might happen?
Thanks
Stretch
i.e. a full day with x impressions - x clicks - 0 $
As far as I am aware the clicks that show up in our stats do no include clicks on PSAs
Maybe Jenstar or ASA can confirm this?
But if you have a whole day where there are impressions and clicks showing but no $, then you should contact the Adsense team, as i have not heard anyone else having seen this problem.
PSAs and AAs are recorded as impressions, but until several months ago clicks weren't funneled through a Google URL so clicks of PSAs were not tracked and reported. They are now funneled through a Google URL so it is possible that PSA clicks are tracked and reported now. Maybe you can contact Google and ask if PSA clicks are reported and let us know what they say.
Also, it's impossible for you or any publisher to know if their site shows PSAs some of the time. Users from a different country visiting a page might be shown PSAs and a page that normally shows paying ads in your country might shows PSAs when paying ad supply exceeds demand. Or there might be PSAs mixed in with Adwords advertisers [webmasterworld.com] in your ad blocks, even if you have alternate ads implemented so PSAs shouldn't be shown period. On that note, unless you'd rather show PSAs than your own content, I recommend implementing the google_alternate_ad_url parameter in your JS code. I use it to either show affiliate ads or text promoting features of my site.
Does it still show up in your stats.
i.e. a full day with x impressions - x clicks - 0 $
Absolutely, it's the stats for last Tuesday to be exact. Impressions, clicks and CTR all have figures but earnings = $0
And thanks richmondsteve
I average 3-digit clicks per day
Wow. If I averaged 3 clicks per day I'd be happy. Seriously though, very helpful response, thank you.
I'll leave it for a bit in case ASA or Jenstar can confirm whether PSAs are tracked and then yes, I'll speak to G and report back.
Thanks again.
Unfortunately, that makes epc a completely worthless figure.
Which is all the more reason to implement alternate ads. PSAs have *always* been included in the impressions. Now they're included in the clicks. To make the stats more meaningful to me I'd already been tracking all AA impressions and subtracting them from Google's reported impressions to come up with paying ad impressions so I can calculate EPM. Now that I'm using a JavaScript click tracker (which doesn't work with all browsers) I can subtract out any PSA clicks - assuming I recognize the domains as those associated with PSAs. I *shouldn't* have any PSA clicks because I have alternate ads implemented in all AdSense code, *but* it does happen (see PSAs mixed in with Adwords advertisers [webmasterworld.com]).
This whole issue strengthens an argument I've been making for a while - Google should split out paying and PSA stats in the reports otherwise the stats are misleading or inaccurate (depending on how you look at it).