Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Then why are they unable to catch these sites.
This has been discussed many times and we are all at a loss as to exactly why Google will not do anything about it.
Is it their lack of manpower or do they deem it too "trivial" with which to bother?
It's certainly extremely annoying for those of use who abide by the T&Cs since it not exactly very difficult to Google for those phrases.
So if you have an obvious ad - not blended, only one ad block on a well written review, with say 10 pages, about say a new (d200 in my case) camera - then the chances are that the guy that read that far and clicks will be at least looking to buy one. The price you will be paid for that click will be high!
Opposite extreme. An MFA page with little content and your clicker got there by following a misleading but interesting looking ad. (Probably on my pages!) Now this guy clicks the SAME ad as before but will not buy a camera. He just clicked to escape. Conversion will be zero in this case. The mfa gets paid 3 cents if lucky. That is how smartpricing is supposed to work. And it does in the long term.
So asking visitors to click is NOT going to help you a few weeks later (2 months in most cases) after smart pricing sees the results of ads on your pages.
Adding 3 adblocks to a page to replace a single one has a slightly similar effect. The ads are more likely to be clicked but they are less likely to convert. So you earn a lower ecpm (ad block) even though you get a higher click through on the page.
[edited by: Nitrous at 2:11 pm (utc) on Mar. 21, 2006]
That question puzzles me again and again. I found many site on which i saw " please click these ads ". [...] Then why are they unable to catch these sites.
Perhaps G has not caught them yet. Perhaps by the time someone at G looks at these sites, they've taken those click solicitations down, and G doesn't feel a need to drop them from AdSense.
Ironically, one of the Xooglers violated the AdSense TOS early in the history of that site. Go figure.