Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Text-ads are the big thing these days, and it's text-ads that are driving the Adsense/Adwords network.
Image ads used to be the most effective...(ie. banners, boxes, etc.)...so I'm thinking many advertisers will pay extra to have those images showing on your site.
In effect, if an image ad can still grab your attention, you're probably really interested in what you're seeing. Which is why some advertisers will pay more for that click.
I am afraid to try them for fear of getting poorly designed ads.
You have to also remember that google now allows animated gifs and flash for everybody. All image ads go through a review, but it is not clear what the criteria are.
I have been playing around with them for a few weeks as an advertiser. Here's some observations from the other side
--by far rectangles do the best. I think advertisers with this spot are generally trying to have high quality space
--conversely, the leaderboards and skyscrapers are almost useless. Even at $0.25 CPM's many sites are useless. Some sites seem designed to ramp pageviews without regard to anything else.
--I have some professionally done animated gifs that look really nice. I also have some sloppy non-animated graphics that I through together. My ugly graphics do much beter as far as ctr.