Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
FWIW, in my own experience, adding new content can be an exercise in frustration because it seldom attracts significant traffic in the short term. All of the search engines (not just Google) can be slow to rank new content even for topics that aren't especially competitive. When I publish a new article, I don't expect to see much in the way of results for months.
We do have rising traffic since 3 days. Nearly +70%. It doesn´t mean thtat this is good or targeted traffic. Sales are almost the same or less.
Chegg on Monday filed suit ...
I am just trying to figure out how the AI overviews help Google financially
it makes me wonder what Google really wants.
Google wants publishers to create content, to train their AI for inclusion in AI Overviews, so they can keep users on their site and send publishers no traffic. The bigger question I have is how long will it take for publishers to realize this and take some sort of decisive action (quit publishing, require a login to view content/membership, etc.) so they can benefit from their work in some way?
If you are not creating a unique product then your days are numbered online. AI can only process info, but people will always need physical products and they will have to go to a website for that...
Google wants publishers to create content, to train their AI for inclusion in AI Overviews, so they can keep users on their site and send publishers no traffic. The bigger question I have is how long will it take for publishers to realize this and take some sort of decisive action (quit publishing, require a login to view content/membership, etc.) so they can benefit from their work in some way?
Google might actually benefit from a culling of the herd.
There's a vast stockpile of publishers and content on the Web, so maybe Google can train its AI perfectly well with a fraction of what's out there now? Google might actually benefit from a culling of the herd.