Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 2:15 am (utc) on Aug 3, 2019]
[edit reason] Split off from another thread... [/edit]
I'll never get how link building can make the content more valuable than it really is without any links pointing to it.Selen, are you saying that the value of the content is so obvious that it should be able to rank without any links?
Google has always valued links too much, to the point that mediocre content can rank on top if enough links point to it. If Google was really able to judge the quality of content, they would not need to consider links at all.
g (and the other se's) have taken notice and either ignore, or penalize, those who seek to game the "system."
If Google was really able to judge the quality of content, they would not need to consider links at all.
Itís also important to understand that search engines like Google do not understand content the way human beings do. Instead, we look for signals we can gather about content and understand how those correlate with how humans assess relevance. How pages link to each other is one well-known signal that we use.
Content is the King and it always remains
I write detailed information only to be outranked by brand sites with 200 words.
In particular where Google rank brand over accurate information from a non-brand site.
The reason is that, so many people started to make so many sites, 90% of them trash, inaccurate, misleading, that's it's hard to know whom to trust. Some are putting to much believe in the Google AI, if the AI was so powerful that it can understands and weights the accuracy of a page, then, the AI would simply writes its own pages (coming next)
Yes, I do get that and I don't know how the hell Google works out what is accurate and what isn't. I
But because he is a professional, he automatically outranked me