Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 3.85.214.0

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Good for seo to implement tags for articles?

     
7:18 am on Jan 12, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 19, 2004
posts:992
votes: 14


Hi so we have website that has text articles and youtube videos.

For seo is it important to implement the tag feature for them? Kindly advise thanks!
10:38 am on Jan 14, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 19, 2004
posts:992
votes: 14


Anyone wanna advise? Anyone using tags?
11:16 am on Jan 14, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:12913
votes: 893


Useless
8:42 am on Jan 15, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:10457
votes: 1091


Play if you think it makes sense, else the content should speak for itself, tags or no tags. As keyply suggests, some of this "micro management" is more trouble than it is worth.
11:34 am on Jan 15, 2018 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2000
posts:12389
votes: 409


Most tag setups are worse than useless... they're the stuff that Panda's made of. Simple basic auto-tagging runs the chance of too many empty pages, thin-pages, and dupe content... ultimately not a satisfactory user experience.

I just saw an academic journal that had links to maybe 40 tag pages per article... not even tag clouds with different sized fonts to suggest which pages are likely to be more important than others. Instead, these were long small-font lists at the bottom of articles. The likelihood of these being useful to navigate is miniscule.

If you cut the number of tags way down and choose core categories, one might argue that these are effectively poor man's category pages. Barry, on seroundtable, has an arrangement that looks like it could be more help than harm, but I can't help but think that rewriting the titles and maybe adding a custom description line might help SER's current setup a bit more. I wonder if he's tried any finer breakdowns into hierarchies.

I've seen some sites that pick top categories by logging user queries and then using those as subcategories. Likely to work best if the number of categories is small... and different sites are likely to have different scenarios depending on user patterns. News sites could well be structured differently from sites that are more topical.

I personally have always felt that, within busy tag pages, archiving pages with sequentially numbered pagination is a makeshift way of frustrating the user, unless site search is very good... but browsing in this arrangement becomes useless. Relevant distribution of link juice most likely sucks.

As keyply suggests, some of this "micro management" is more trouble than it is worth

I don't think he said it was more trouble than it's worth. I think he effectively said that commonly used tagging schemes he's seen don't do anything useful.

Anyway, if you haven't guessed, I'm not a big fan of tags. Google's action with YouTube in 2012 suggested Google's unhappiness with them, not for search, but for user friendliness....

YouTube Makes Tags Private
Aug-Sept 2012
https://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4485756.htm [webmasterworld.com]

I think that have a limited number of well-selected related links directely on the prime article page is far better than tags in many ways, albeit harder to implement. Attempts have been made, on large social sites, to come up with ways of communally creating hierarchies in social tagging systems... but these too ran into the drawback of lazy tagging. See...

Organizing social tags into hierarchies
04/29/2006 - by Bill Slawski
http://www.seobythesea.com/2006/04/organizing-social-tags-into-hierarchies/ [seobythesea.com]

1:39 pm on Jan 15, 2018 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 19, 2004
posts:992
votes: 14


Ok thanks guys for the valuable input.. I'd rather focus on key functionalities than this tag feature.... from what your advice says. Thanks!