Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.95.13

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

From Google: Inside Look at Search Quality Meetings

     
6:08 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Mar 30, 2005
posts:12905
votes: 194


Google has posted an uncut eight minute video of one of their weekly Quality Launch Review meetings (using eight video cameras and 16 microphones, no less)

Watch it here:
[insidesearch.blogspot.com...]
8:16 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 28, 2002
posts:757
votes: 0


What I find most interesting is the discussion of the tradeoff between doing things perfectly and using less resources. Even what seems like a relatively simple task like spell checking consumes vast resources when done on Google's scale. It's worth remembering when we're thinking about why other parts of the algo work they way they do - it may be the result of a similar tradeoff, where Google is doing things in a way that they know is sub-optimal in order to save resources.
8:31 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator goodroi is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 21, 2004
posts:3114
votes: 98


Nice reminder that Googlers think much differently than search marketers. When was the last time you thought of qps or trigrams?

ps I suspect many of you reading my comment haven't taken the time to view the video, so guess what percentage of queries have 10 or more words and then watch the video for the answer.
11:12 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 14, 2011
posts:741
votes: 21


I can't get video to play properly will try later but the faces in the room show how seriously they take search quality however what I saw was out of touch with current seo tactics which seem focused on negative seo
11:46 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Aug 31, 2011
posts: 17
votes: 0


Interesting. I think this should make you realize that the algo is ultimately written by a bunch of guys in a room that are prone to make some mistakes. Fact is .1% could actually be 5% or even 10%, and it would take another Thursday meeting or maybe more to correct it.

Either way great insight.
11:52 pm on Mar 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

joined:Dec 28, 2005
posts:605
votes: 0


Great insight.

I now have a much better understanding of why this search engine is so lost and out of touch lately... who are those people?
12:22 am on Mar 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 14, 2011
posts:741
votes: 21


As well as targets BH can fill the defunct damaging domains with History Object in javascript and make each user a contributer to links. Bad domains should be ignored google!
Ah why do I bother anyway what are tri-thingies again.......?
4:24 am on Mar 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


what I saw was out of touch with current seo tactics

In this video they are focused on user satisfaction for ALL their users - and rightly so, IMO. I doubt that they will publish a video where they talk about defeating specific SEO tactics. But I can tell you from discussions with Googlers at Pubcon, Matt Cutts' team has a lot of that going on too.
5:37 am on Mar 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 22, 2003
posts:1230
votes: 0


Apple should be proud of this video.
6:00 am on Mar 13, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member play_bach is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 20, 2005
posts:3074
votes: 0


> Apple should be proud of this video.

Yup. Almost everybody was using an Apple MBP or Air. Not too surprising to me really since I first noticed this trend by programmers switching to Apple laptops right around when OSX (i.e., Unix) came out - and that was over ten years ago.