Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Right now my site is an amalgamation of articles from various news groups and I usually cite an article(s) on a page by using a summary and then providing a link to the actual article itself.
No that i have more traffic or reached a plateau in my traffic i wanted to know how google would treat my site if all 200+ articles were rewritten and basically made into original articles?
Right now my rankings on my keywords vary from 10-30, i am top 30 for half my articles. the rest are within top 50.
Has anyone seen a dramic shift in rankings when they create their own copy vs. summarizing and linking to other people's work?
i wanted to know how google would treat my site if all 200+ articles were rewritten and basically made into original articles?
Google would like it very much. However, the authors of the original articles might see it as plagiaristic if you just changed some words and phrasing, and then claimed it as original. If you base new articles on what you've learnt from others, no problem - just shifting things around might not be.
There is no duplicate content and only 1 adsense adblock per page. There are about 150 pages with affiliate marketing products...but with original descriptions and marketing pitches.
Google hates this site, only 18 pages can currently be found in google. (12 of the 18 pages are affiliate marketing pages - go figure) Google used to acknowledge about 350 to 400 pages on any given day.
I have not targeted hot money keywords. I use #*$! and pick from the bottom 1/3 for this site as an experiment.
However, MSN, YAHOO, and ASK love this site, so life is fine with out G.