Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Just launched... take a look at here [techcrunch.com] and here [gigaom.com] and here [searchenginejournal.com]...
Google Co-op Launches [google.com]
This is the most significant product from google this year and will have a direct impact on its bottomline
Well... i have start with atleast 3 niche search engines already... working on them currently...
This is definetly disruptive idea...
Cheers
[edited by: tedster at 6:05 am (utc) on Oct. 24, 2006]
Again, unless I misunderstand you, it does not seem like I can have a Google search box that gives users three ways to search: my site, CSE or the Web.
The big flaw I see with this is the inability to show search results to users with javascript disabled.
I'd be interested to see what pool of advertisers the ads are drawing from. Are they showing ads from the content network or the search engine pool?
The list of terms used could easily be captured and databased using PHP.
The one thing I'm not of a fan of is the javascript file in the search box code. I took that out but, I'm wondering how egregious of a sin that is.
Got listed on a couple of news sites and have recived 1000 uniques since yesterday afternoon. Not bad for a days work. It can can be set up quickly and easily and tailored to your customers or any niches you are interested in.
Maybe small adsense driven co-op engines searching only cherry picked websites might have a role?
Also the future lies in niche search engines if you look at the trend. Some serial entrepreneurs are getting into the age.
Also, how many niche SE's can google continue to launch themselves. This Co-op idea is so clever it beats the others in the game with big financial muscle. It's kind of an opportunity for individual webmaster launch niche SE's without much effort... as someone said hosted search results.
But this can be improved... more with more control to the webmaster.
Cheers
you might want to set scrollbars to auto
How do I do that?
I've noticed that th 950px setting gives problems on some results pages with the "previous" and "next" links being covered up by the search box that I have at the bottom of the page. It seems that when Google adds a "similar pages" option on some of the search results it is pushing the size of the results above 950px.
I'm quite dissapointed by the lack of documentation, such as how to get an 'opt out' CSE to use UK results as standard.
Maybe someone from Google will fix the documentation issue by adding an advanced documentation section, I'm happy to get my hands dirty.
Anyone know if I can have moderation authority over contributions? I supposed I may find out soon enough either way.
I will put the search box on pages where students and researchers would be looking for information. It won't make a cent for me but it will be add quality to my site. That's what gets me the academic and government links. So in the long run it may help and it didn't take long to build.
I can't seem to get the results page working on my site. I'll try again when I have time. Meanwhile the results are on Google.
This custom search is perfect if your site contains highly selective links. In my case I run a business reference site and have many links that are selectively chosen. To add all these links to create a database I simply ran a MySQL query and then copied the urls. Easy. Setup is to load the results on the site and also tied it into AdSense.
Also, the ads which come up with Adsense turned on do NOT take into account the search terms you associate with your site in the setup. i.e. if your site is all about widgets and you enter "widgets" in the keywords section. Yest when someone searches, they only search on "large" instead of "large widgets" then the ads which come up only refer to "large" (which can have many unintended implications) rather than "widgets".
I think they need to do a bit more work on it before we'll be switching to it. This should have been marked as 'beta test'.
[edited by: MikeNoLastName at 8:58 pm (utc) on Oct. 25, 2006]
I have had this running on a throw away domain for 48 hours now.
It's a great way to search your own site, but even better try setting up an entire site based on your 'human' knowledge of a niche. Take out the phony, scraped, directory, junk listings and leave squeaky clean, and very helpful SERPS + it has the ability to monetise via AdSense for eCPM.
However, It seems that the majority of webmasters around here either "don't get it" or are just to busy implementing this.
Amazing how many "webmaster" do not know how to read...every single "how to?" in this thread is clearly explained on the google site (at least the version i am served here in Spain using ie7 - and I am not a native English speaker).
Every single question posted can be answered by "go back and READ!".
I have my niche vertical search engine up and running (close to 3000 sites) including weighted SERPs and the feedback from the first one thousand users (invited to test) is more than encouraging (including adsense money with an average of .65 $ per click).
Obviously this is not a service for e-commerce websites but for information providing sites - websites that exist to help users find the most accurate information available on the net.
If you are already known for your expertise within your industry people will use your custom search engine beacause the user trusts YOU to select the websites to be searched, ranked and returned by Google (my knowledge combined with Google's technology is a dream come true for me, my users and ultimatively Google.)
At the same time Google is providing the (in my case) very targeted ads and shares the revenue with me - this enables me to focus on the content (in this case usefull websites to add to MY index).
If anybody out there really believes that this is *evil* for anybody than I am happy to be evil too.
Of course, if successful, this makes DMOZ and its clones obsolete, which is not a bad thing in my book.
And, just to make it clear: I do understand that an institution like New York Times prefers its own search engine to avoid a branding conflict even though its clearly NOT state of the art. Not in every case *user experience* is the top priority - no matter what polished press releases say.
Oh, by the way, maybe webmasterworld could dump its search engine from the 90s and implement Google Custom Search - I would appreciate it!
# Search Results Title
# Search Results Background
# Search Results Text
# Search Results Links
# Search Results Visited Links
# Search Results Similar Pages Link
How can i possibly do the same, like font type, size and other aspects of the above options.
Also, i have seen some niche search engines using google cse have removed the text 'Google Custom Search' from the text box. how can i do that?
Thanks for any help.