Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Tells how to get more site visibility

         

shafaki

2:35 am on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In general, webmasters can improve a site's visibility in our search results by increasing the number of high-quality sites that link to it.

[google.com...]

This piece of text is abvious and very basic, but it was interesting for Google to say it like that out load in a clean and clear way.

Alioc

2:52 am on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This info is available in the reports of Page and Brin even before there was no Google and it is the base of Google's algo. I think that post is about 4 years late. :-)

shafaki

3:01 am on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The value of links has been stated over and over again, but recently, new factors have come into play more strongly than before. The quote above is just a reassurance about the role links remain to play now.

BeeDeeDubbleU

8:34 am on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



In general, webmasters can improve a site's visibility in our search results by increasing the number of high-quality sites that link to it.

shafaki

4:42 pm on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



... which is the more interesting .. and I wonder of high quality is directly proportional to PR and exactly equals it.

ownerrim

5:13 pm on Aug 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have no real clue but I am leaning in this direction: high quality links are:

1. relevant links (relevant to the topic of the page being linked to).

2. links from pages with page rank

3. links with relevant anchor text.

I think this is basically what all the SE's do, but the pagerank thing sets google apart in a very distinct way. For example, it is quite easy to get hundreds and hundreds of directory links and IMO spam your way to the top of MSN.

Such links are on "relevant" pages and have good anchor text, but they have no pagerank in most cases; therefore google's estimation is simply that such links have less value since, obviously, no one else thought those pages (the link referrers) had value either (by linking to them and passing on pagerank).

Pagerank is often criticized because webmasters in the know can manipulate the system. But the vast majority of webmasters are not "in the know", and for this reason, the pagerank system is still reasonably democratic and makes for a better system than yahoo or msn.