Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.138.175

Forum Moderators: goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Settles U.S. Street View Data Collection Case With $7 Million Fine

     
6:14 pm on Mar 12, 2013 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:24356
votes: 556


Hmmm, small change for Google, imho.

Google has agreed to pay a $7m (4.6m) fine for collecting people's personal data without authorisation as part of its Street View service.

In a settlement with 38 US states, the internet giant agreed to destroy emails, passwords, and web histories.

The data was harvested from home wireless networks as Street View cars photographed neighbourhoods between 2008 and 2010.

Google said it was pleased to have resolved the issue.

"We work hard to get privacy right at Google. But in this case we didn't, which is why we quickly tightened up our systems to address the issue," the firm said in a statement.

"The project leaders never wanted this data, and didn't use it or even look at it. We're pleased to have worked with Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen and the other state attorneys general to reach this agreement."Google Settles U.S. Street View Data Collection Case With $7 Million Fine [bbc.co.uk]
US Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman announced the legal settlement.


Earlier story
Google Said To Be Close To Settling Street View Data Collection [webmasterworld.com]
6:37 pm on Mar 12, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 26, 2002
posts:813
votes: 1


From the bbc link above:
This is the biggest fine of its type to date, said Jan Dawson, chief telecoms analyst at research firm Ovum.

Well, back in August '12, news outlets said Google is paying a record $22.5 million fine to settle allegations that it broke a privacy promise.
[lmgtfy.com...]

Who gets the money?
8:32 am on Mar 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member sgt_kickaxe is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 14, 2010
posts:3169
votes: 0


Who gets the money?

Theoretically the tax payer does.

It amazes me though that people will get into a huff if their email address is collected from a street view car while at the same time having no issue with their molecular signature being monitored from space. How do you think they are finding all the new species lately? I hope the data is put to good use, for people.
10:27 pm on Mar 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
posts:14663
votes: 99


It's still silly because it was openly broadcast information without encryption meaning the person broadcasting it obviously didn't care if it were intercepted otherwise they would have had a password requirement at a minimum. Kind of like someone complaining others listened in and recorded their CB or Shortwave broadcasts where weren't scrambled.

Back when the fist cordless phones came out, long before spread spectrum, everyone knew they weren't encrypted either and you switched to a hard-wired landline if you didn't want people listening to your conversation. If you think listening to others cordless calls was hard, it wasn't, you just unplugged your base station and then you could hear the other parties over your handset.

Oh well, at least this chapter's over, but I wouldn't be surprised if something more interesting was going on as well and possibly why the small fine as maybe a deal was struck. I'm not conspiracy theorist at all but I know for a fact that while the government couldn't do what Google did without a warrant, once someone else has done it they're perfectly within their legal rights to "buy a copy" if it were made available. That's the business model some data mining companies that currently stealth mine the internet that I won't mention anymore because I got tired of seeing my blog posts being monitored by those groups and DOD, DHS, etc. which was easily spotted in my logs.

FWIW, Google didn't do anything drive-by hackers do except Google fessed up and they aren't the one's I'd be worrying about if I were running an open wifi because it would be easier to set someone up for some real trouble using their open wifi IP connection.
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members